top of page
  • Dagny

Rigged Medicine After the Kids!

Answer: Pfizer.

A newly released document shows that drug giant Pfizer added a secret heart attack drug to the children’s version of its Wuhan coronavirus (COVID-19) vaccine.

The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Advisory Committee that voted 17-0 to approve the jabs for children as young as five was notified that the children’s formulation of the drug contains tromethamine (Tris), a chemical that reduces blood acidity and stabilizes people who have suffered a heart attack.

“To provide a vaccine with an improved stability profile, the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine for use in children 5-11 years of age uses tromethamine (Tris) buffer instead of the phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) as used in the previous formulation and excludes sodium chloride and potassium chloride.”

This “new formulation,” the document further reads, must be stored at a different temperature than the adult version of the injection.

Is it satire when it's true?

COVID vaccine mandate an “attempted ideological purge” of Christian Navy SEALs, lawyer says

Federal lawsuit filed by Catholic, Protestant and Eastern Orthodox service members says Navy’s mandate violates religious liberties.

Twenty-six United States Navy SEALs and nine other Navy special forces members say the Navy’s mandatory COVID-19 vaccine policy violates constitutionally protected religious liberty and has led to threats, coercion and retaliation against the service members for merely requesting religious exemptions, according to a federal lawsuit.

“After all these elite warriors have done to defend our freedoms, the Navy is now threatening their careers, families, and finances,” said Michael Berry, general counsel for the First Liberty Institute, a public-interest law firm that represents the service members. “It’s appalling and it has to stop before any more harm is done to our national security.”

The suit was filed Tuesday in U.S. District Court in Fort Worth on behalf of 26 SEALs, five special warfare combatant craft crewmen, three Navy divers and a Navy explosive ordnance disposal technician. The plaintiffs, who were identified by pseudonyms for security reasons, are listed as Catholic, Protestant and Eastern Orthodox. They expressed a variety of religious objections to the COVID vaccines, including ties to abortion-derived cell lines and the potential the shots could cause harm or alter the way God designed the body to perform.

The suit alleges the vaccine mandates and how they are being carried out violate the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution and its Free Exercise Clause, the federal Religious Freedom Restoration Act, the Administrative Procedure Act and official policies of the Department of Defense and the Department of the Navy. The suit seeks preliminary and permanent injunctions against the mandates, declaration that the policies violated plaintiffs’ religious rights, and monetary damages. Defendants include President Joseph R. Biden Jr., Secretary of Defense Lloyd J. Austin III, the U.S. Department of Defense and Secretary of the Navy Carlos Del Toro.

“The fact that the government has not granted a single religious exemption from the vaccine mandate shows that the Biden administration does not care about religious freedom,” said Berry, a U.S. Marine Corps veteran who served for three years in Afghanistan. “Instead, this appears to be an attempted ideological purge. Forcing a service member to choose between their faith and serving their country is abhorrent to the Constitution and America’s values.”

The Navy has not yet responded to the lawsuit or its claims. Active-duty vaccination is required by Nov. 28

Based on direction from President Biden, Secretary Austin issued a vaccine mandate Aug. 24 for all active-duty and reserve service members. On Aug. 30, Secretary Del Toro issued a Navy policy requiring full vaccination by Nov. 28 for active-duty and Dec. 28 for reserves. Those who don’t comply are subject to immediate consequences that could include criminal prosecution by court martial, involuntary separation, removal from promotion lists, loss of special pay, being placed in non-deployable status and repaying the military’s cost to train them, among others, the suit said.

Biden also issued a vaccine mandate for federal workers and contractors, and an emergency standard through the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) that compels employers with 100 or more staff to ensure employees are fully vaccinated or undergo weekly COVID testing. All of the federal mandates are being challenged in court. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit issued a temporary stay of the OSHA vaccine mandate on Nov. 6. The Texas Navy lawsuit filed Tuesday is similar to a complaint filed Oct. 6 in U.S. District Court in Pensacola, Fla., and a federal suit filed Oct. 15 in Tampa.

More here:

Little Hero setting an example for everyone:

"You can suspend me again for not wearing a mask, I don't care, I'm still not going to wear one. I HOPE YOU ALL GO TO JAIL FOR DOING THIS"

2nd grade hero who's been suspended 38 times for not wearing a mask absolutely destroys the evil School Board.

2 minutes. Worthy.

A short time later the School Board gave up and removed the mask mandate.

A huge French study shows BELIEVING you had Covid is associated with many later symptoms. But ACTUALLY having had Covid isn't associated with any (except loss of sense of smell).

The Journal of the American Medical Association has another stunning paper out, this one on post-Covid symptoms in almost 27,000 French adults.

Researchers asked people to report whether they had had Covid and whether they had any of 18 lasting symptoms like insomnia, fatigue, or cough. They found that self-reported Covid was very strongly associated with nearly every symptom.

But the scientists then went a step further.

They also had Sars-Cov-2 antibody test results for the people they had surveyed, so they didn’t have to depend on self-reported Covid. They knew who really had had Covid and who had not.

They then compared self-reported symptoms in people with antibodies - that is, people who had actually been infected and recovered from Covid - to the general population. And they found no difference in almost any symptom.

Covid was not a risk factor for chest pain, or breathing difficulties, or trouble focusing, or stomach pain, or any of the many, many other complaints that long Covid “patients” and interest groups say are real. There was one interesting exception; people with Covid antibodies did have a much higher rate of anosmia, losing one’s sense of smell. Because anosmia is a known and lasting side effect, it serves as a useful control of sorts. The researchers also found that almost 60 percent of the people with antibodies HAD NO IDEA THEY HAD EVEN HAD COVID AT ALL. Meanwhile, while more than half the people who said they had had Covid had no antibodies. (Welcome to the plague so severe most halfway healthy adults don’t even know they’ve had it.)

The study strongly suggests that many people are using previous Covid diagnoses - either real or imagined - to help explain away common physical symptoms such as joint pain or cough. It also suggests that actually being infected Covid is far less risky than thinking you have been infected with Covid for many people.

The researchers concluded by explaining that people who claim they have long Covid may need help “to identify cognitive and behavioral mechanisms that may be targeted to relieve the symptoms.” Which is a very polite way of putting the truth.

This study should slow, if not stop, the rush to medicalize long Covid. It is yet more proof that the illness is a group of squishy (if painful and difficult) symptoms looking for a name - and more importantly a billing code.

But so many patients and physicians and public health experts are now invested (in some cases literally) in making long Covid real that the gravy train will likely roll on. SOURCE:

It's one of many scandals in this health crisis. Those who violate their oaths will soon be exposed.

Tell them "No, that's a spoiler alert".

UK government published false statistics claiming without evidence that the unvaxed are 32 times more likely to die.

A former HEAD at the Office for National Statistics @ONS alleges that the ONS are MANIPULATING statistics to conclude that the unvaccinated are 32x more likely to die from Covid than the vaccinated. He has issued a written complaint to @UKStatsAuth.

Record number 4.4 million US workers quit their job in September, feds report

The report also shows arts, entertainment, recreation industry had highest number of increased "quits".

Hey Employers! Want to be liable for the Vax deaths and disability?

Dr. Robert Malone:

"I predict that the failure of the Biden vax mandates will eventually lead to huge legal liability for companies and academic institutions- illegal termination, vaccine damages, etc. This will also be a major financial windfall for independent lawyers.

Why independent lawyers, you ask? Because the large firms are all getting bought out by Pharma contracting for legal work and triggering "conflict of interest" clauses that block them from taking these cases.

What does this have to do with Biden's mandates? Because if they fail in the courts, then the legal topcover for the academic institutions, hospitals, and businesses vanish. Government and Pharma are indemnified. So then the organizations become the bagholders for liability."

Employers mandate? Employers legally liable for the consequences.

“Many Oklahomans may not know that COVID-19 vaccines have already been given liability protection from the federal government,” Standridge said. “If an employee is required to receive the vaccine or some other medical treatment as a condition of employment and it causes that person harm, our citizens need to know they’ll have some recourse that will provide them with meaningful relief. That’s what my legislation will do.” by Kevin Severin, KOKH Staff Friday, November 12th 2021

More setting a good example:

New commander of Oklahoma National Guard declares he will NOT enforce the Defense Department's vaccine mandate after his pro-vax predecessor was suddenly replaced by state governor Kevin Stitt

  • Army Brigadier General Thomas Mancino will be the new adjutant general, Governor Kevin Stitt said. He has yet to be confirmed by the state senate

  • His predecessor, Army Major General Michael Thompson, a black guy, said that he found out he'd lost his job via social media

  • Thompson is a public supporter of the vaccines, and posted a picture of himself receiving a COVID booster shot in late October on Twitter

  • Governor Stitt's office said that the change of plans in the transition timeline was for 'continuity of operations'

  • The day after he took the job from Thompson, Mancio put out a policy memo confirming the state would not enforce the mandate on state-controlled forces

Racist enough?

Safe and effective monoclonal antibody is denied by a black health care worker to a white guy specifically because he is white:

“If I were black or Hispanic then I’d be able to qualify?” Smith asked a black female medical worker.

“That’s right… yup,” the medical worker responded.

“I’m being denied medical service because of my race?” Smith said.

“That’s the criteria,” she said.

The Baseline count is what the normal annual incidence of this is. The C19 is the actual count now. The X Factor is how many times above normal this adverse reaction is.

The incidence of these symptoms is normally 0, so the increase as a percentage is infinte:

The New York Times was and is currently in a lawsuit with Project Veritas who sued the Times for defamation and libel.

The FBI violently seized atty-client protected private communications between Project Veritas and its lawyer.

Then the FBI gave these lawyer communications to the New York Times.

Despite the fact that O’Keefe had surrendered the reported diary, he told “Hannity” that federal agents showed up at his home with a battering ram and detained him.

“I woke up to a pre-dawn raid,” he said. ”Banging on my door. I went to my door to answer the door and there were 10 FBI agents with a battering ram, white blinding lights. They turned me around, handcuffed me and threw me against the hallway. I was partially clothed in front of my neighbors.”

“They confiscated my phone. They raided my apartment. On my phone were many of my reporters’ notes. A lot of my sources unrelated to this story and a lot of confidential donor information to our news organization,” he said.

“I’ve heard ‘the process is the punishment.’ I didn’t really understand what that meant until this weekend. And Sean, I wouldn’t wish this on any journalist.”

In all, two of his phones were taken by theFBI, he said.

Paul Calli, an attorney for O’Keefe who sat next to him during the interview, said the diary in question was purchased from a source but never published by Project Veritas.

O’Keefe later voluntarily gave the diary to the police. With regard to whether it was stolen, Cali said, “Nobody knows if that’s the case.”

“This is an attack on the First Amendment by the Department of Justice,” O’Keefe told Fox News. “I’m calling upon all journalists to take a stand against this. A source comes to us with information, I didn’t even decide to publish it.”

“If they can do this to me, if they can do it to this journalist and raid my home and take my reporter notes, they’ll do it to any journalist,” he added. “This is about something very fundamental in this country. I don’t know which direction this country is going in, but journalists everywhere have to rise up because we broke no laws here.”

“If they can do it to me, they’ll do it to anybody,” he said.

“The FBI took materials of current and former Veritas journalists despite the fact that our legal team previously contacted the Department of Justice and voluntarily conveyed unassailable facts that demonstrate Project Veritas’ lack of involvement in criminal activity and/or criminal intent,” he said.

As far as the source of the raid, the diary in question, O’Keefe said he could not authenticate it.

“At the end of the day,” he said, “we made the ethical decision that because, in part, we could not determine if the diary was real, if the diary in fact belonged to Ashley Biden, or if the contents of the diary occurred, we could not publish the diary and any part thereof. …

“Project Veritas gave the diary to law enforcement to ensure it could be returned to its rightful owner. We never published it,” he said.

O’Keefe: The FBI took materials of current, and former, Veritas journalists despite the fact that our legal team previously contacted the Department of Justice and voluntarily conveyed unassailable facts that demonstrate Project Veritas’ lack of involvement in criminal activity and/or criminal intent. Like any reporter, we regularly deal with the receipt of source information and take steps to verify its authenticity, legality, and newsworthiness. Our efforts were the stuff of responsible, ethical, journalism and we are in no doubt that Project Veritas acted properly at each and every step

O’Keefe “put himself at great risk” when he released a statement on the investigation of PV journalists. The FBI raided his home the very next day. Now tonight, five days after the FBI raided his home, The New York Times released a new report on James O’Keefe with several private documents from Project Veritas. It took Chris Wray’s FBI less than a week to leak O’Keefe’s documents to their cohorts at the NY Times.

31 views0 comments

Recent Posts

See All


bottom of page