Happy thought here:
Serious question. It was clearly engineered.
It’s clearly not dangerous.
It clearly provides natural immunity. If black hats can bioengineer and release bio weapons, can white hats bioengineer and release vaccines?
We explored this over a year ago and this is well established technologically. Personally I believe it to be true, but there is unlikely ever to be public proof due to the freaking out that would ensue. If so then any credible covid risk may be in the rear view mirror by February.
Merry Christmas !
We are living through the Second Inquisition.
The words and methods used during the Catholic Inquisition of the Middle Ages are being used again today.
Just as the widespread development of the Gutenberg printing press led to the Gutenberg Bible and numerous other books on many subjects, similarly the internet's development led to people doing their own research and finding out the trusted authorities were lying and fleecing the people with profitable pseudo-scientific hoaxes.
The Gutenberg Bible made it possible for people to read it themselves in English and become their own theologians. Books on science, medicine and the world made the great Renaissance possible.
It also led to the violence of the Protestant Reformation, and the Inquisition crackdown on dissent, including the conviction of Galileo etc..
Just as global warming was a highly profitable hoax, so is the dangerous vaccination scheme for covid. The crackdown on dissent we are experiencing today is essentially the same:
Book burning = Shadow banning, blocking, removal of websites, firing those who dissent.
Arrests and the house arrest of Galileo = Mass Lockdowns that are scientifically unsupported. Covid concentration camps in Canada and Australia.
Excommunication of heretics = The Twitter excommunication of President Trump and so many others. Facebook jail.
Torture and death = Side effects of vaccination, loss of jobs, forced masking, vaccination of children, mandates
Ritual Sacrament = Vaccination.
Threats and Greetings from the White House:
Here are some texts from the Inquisition:
The 1578 edition of the Directorium Inquisitorum (a standard Inquisitorial manual) spelled out the purpose of inquisitorial penalties: ... quoniam punitio non refertur primo & per se in correctionem & bonum eius qui punitur, sed in bonum publicum ut alij terreantur, & a malis committendis avocentur (translation: "... for punishment does not take place primarily and per se for the correction and good of the person punished, but for the public good in order that others may become terrified and weaned away from the evils they would commit").[15]
Following the Inquisition's injunction against Galileo, the papal Master of the Sacred Palaceordered that Foscarini's Letter be banned, and Copernicus' De revolutionibus suspended until corrected. The papal Congregation of the Index preferred a stricter prohibition, and so with the Pope's approval, on March 5 the Congregation banned all books advocating the Copernican system, which it called "the false Pythagorean doctrine, altogether contrary to Holy Scripture."[3]
Francesco Ingoli, a consultor to the Holy Office, recommended that De revolutionibus be amended rather than banned due to its utility for calendrics. In 1618 the Congregation of the Index accepted his recommendation, and published their decision two years later, allowing a corrected version of Copernicus' book to be used. The uncorrected De revolutionibus remained on the Index of banned books until 1758.[50]
Galileo's works advocating Copernicanism were therefore banned, and his sentence prohibited him from "teaching, defending… or discussing" Copernicanism. In Germany, Kepler's works were also banned by the papal order.[51]
With the loss of many of his defenders in Rome because of Dialogue Concerning the Two Chief World Systems, in 1633 Galileo was ordered to stand trial on suspicion of heresy "for holding as true the false doctrine taught by some that the sun is the center of the world" against the 1616 condemnation, since "it was decided at the Holy Congregation [...] on 25 Feb 1616 that [...] the Holy Office would give you an injunction to abandon this doctrine, not to teach it to others, not to defend it, and not to treat of it; and that if you did not acquiesce in this injunction, you should be imprisoned".[56]
Galileo was interrogated while threatened with physical torture.[51] A panel of theologians, consisting of Melchior Inchofer, Agostino Oreggi and Zaccaria Pasqualigo, reported on the Dialogue. Their opinions were strongly argued in favour of the view that the Dialogue taught the Copernican theory.[57]
Galileo was found guilty, and the sentence of the Inquisition, issued on 22 June 1633,[58] was in three essential parts:
Galileo was found "vehemently suspect of heresy", namely of having held the opinions that the Sun lies motionless at the centre of the universe, that the Earth is not at its centre and moves, and that one may hold and defend an opinion as probable after it has been declared contrary to Holy Scripture. He was required to "abjure, curse, and detest" those opinions.[59]
He was sentenced to formal imprisonment at the pleasure of the Inquisition.[60] On the following day this was commuted to house arrest, which he remained under for the rest of his life.
His offending Dialogue was banned; and in an action not announced at the trial, publication of any of his works was forbidden, including any he might write in the future.[61]
Hey THIS IS NEAT!
You can see here how much of a pharmaceutical shill your doctor is. Just put in their name and it gives you how much money they took from pharmaceutical companies going back years!
BTW: My MD has accepted only $10.95 in "food and beverage" from Pfizer and that was back in 2014! We love Dr. Kahn!
Click here and check your MD:
The FDA is now seizing the harmless and effective drug Ivermectin when it is shipped in from India. Suppliers are now routing through other countries to stay ahead of the FDA...
Ivermectin banned, Abortion pills OK:
New ways around it perhaps:
Two Common Over-the-Counter Compounds Reduce COVID-19 Virus Replication by 99% in Early Testing
Due to his earlier research with colleagues at UF, Ostrov already knew diphenhydramine was potentially effective against the SARS-CoV-2 virus. The latest discovery has its roots in a routine meeting of scientists with the Global Virus Network’s COVID-19 task force. One researcher presented unpublished data on federally approved compounds that inhibit SARS-CoV-2 activity, including lactoferrin.
Like diphenhydramine, lactoferrin is available without a prescription. Ostrov thought about pairing it with diphenhydramine and ran with the idea. In lab tests on human and monkey cells, the combination was particularly potent: Individually, the two compounds each inhibited SARS-CoV-2 virus replication by about 30%. Together, they reduced virus replication by 99%.
The findings, Ostrov said, are a first step in developing a formulation that could be used to accelerate COVID-19 recovery. It also raises the prospect of further study through an academic-corporate partnership for human clinical trials focused on COVID-19 prevention. Additional research into the compounds’ effectiveness for COVID-19 prevention is already underway in mouse models.
To establish their findings, the research team focused on proteins expressed in human cells known as sigma receptors. In COVID-19 cases, the virus “hijacks” stress-response machinery, including sigma receptors, in order to replicate in the body. Interfering with that signaling appears to be the key to inhibiting the virus’s potency. “We now know the detailed mechanism of how certain drugs inhibit SARS-CoV-2 infection,” Ostrov said.
Data from the experiments show that a highly specific sigma receptor binding drug candidate (with pain relieving properties), and formulated combinations of over-the-counter products (such as diphenhydramine and lactoferrin) have the potential to inhibit virus infection and decrease recovery time from COVID-19, the researchers concluded.
Pilots Dying - Surge in pilot deaths is a warning sign to all
A total of one hundred eleven pilots died in the first eight months of this year! This is a 1,750% increase from 2020, when the world was supposed to be in the middle of a pandemic. A list of the deceased individuals was published in the Air Line Pilot Association magazine. In comparison, there were 6 airline pilot deaths in 2020, and only one death in 2019.
Most of the 111 deaths occurred after the covid-19 jabs were rolled out en masse. Because there are no medical codes for vaccine-induced death, most of the deaths are blamed on other causes. These causes may be related to the pathological evidence behind vaccine injuries, but are never coded as such. Pathological evidence is often ignored, and the deaths of young men and women are often referred to as “sudden” or “unexplained” – with no pathological investigation.
Only 5 deaths were recorded from January-March in 2021, when vaccine uptake was low. Peculiarly, a total of (39) deaths occurred in July and (34) occurred in August — right after governments and private companies used vaccine mandates to violate the privacy of their employees and punish them. Even though these intimidation tactics are illegal, these vaccine mandates were used to scare pilots into submission. Like in many professional fields, pilots went against their own beliefs and against their private medical situation, accepting the subjugation. Many complied with the vaccine mandates because the discrimination was so strong, equal opportunities were being shuttered and personal health decisions were not being honored. Many were afraid to lose their job and their future career prospects, so they lined up, hoping for the best while justifying the medical tyranny.
Young, previously healthy athletes are seeing the same trend in mortality as the pilots are. Goodsciencing.com tracked over 300 post-vaccine medical incidents from January 1 to December 10. These incidents involved young, previously healthy athletes who suddenly collapsed on the playing field in 2021. Out of these unexplained medical incidents, 170 of the athletes ended up dead. These trends are not surprising, because pharmacovigilance data collected around the world shows that the mRNA vaccines are causing heart inflammation, autoimmune issues, and immune depletion, leading to sudden cardiac arrest, neurological dysfunction and severe infections. CovidVaccineVictims.com retains a memorial for people who passed away as a result of this horrendously forceful, ghastly genetic experiment.
The issues with vaccination have been brushed aside for decades, ever since the 1986 Childhood Vaccine Injury Act granted legal protections for vaccine companies in the United States. Enjoying legal immunity for over thirty years, vaccine makers made a mockery of the rule of law, exempting themselves from legal accountability when their products harm people. Today, mRNA vaccine makers have entered into contracts with governments around the world to exempt their operations from any judicial responsibility or a jury trial. Vaccine makers are operating above the law and will continue to get away with genocide if the rule of law is not restored. The mRNA vaccine makers have plans for endless boosters now. Their dominion over governments and their endless money supply will allow them to steal, kill and destroy using propaganda, coercion and force.
https://newstarget.com/2021-12-13-us-pilot-deaths-increase-after-covid-vaccine-rollout.html
Yesterday, the British Parliament voted for vaccine passports.
"I write with such a heavy heart, that on December 14th 2021 the United Kingdom and my fellow citizens truly lost one of their longest-standing liberties: the right to pass without let or hinderance. Effectively, the right to freely assemble. "
- Raheem Kassam, Editor-in-Chief, The National Pulse:
Scotland Data Reveal: Death spikes after vaccination in older people
People over the age of 55 in Scotland saw a surge in deaths from all causes from 24 to 30 weeks after most people in the age group received their 2nd jab. This surge in deaths peaked at over 25% higher than the 5-year average (2014-2019) for every age group in this study.
Health authorities around the world are reacting to this surge by promoting a 3rd jab.
Currently over 50% of people older than 55 in Scotland have already received a “booster”. But what if the cause of this surge in deaths is the vaccine itself?
As you can see from the graphs, there is a dip in deaths at the same time people are receiving their 2nd jab. Are we becoming addicted to a shot that produces a short-term benefit followed by long term harm? Is the short-term benefit going to wane? Will future boosters “wear off” sooner and sooner? Does this remind you of any other drugs? Who is the “pusher” this time?
Source for all cause deaths in Scotland: https://www.nrscotland.gov.uk/statistics-and-data/statistics/statistics-by-theme/vital-events/general-publications/weekly-and-monthly-data-on-births-and-deaths/deaths-involving-coronavirus-covid-19-in-scotland/related-statistics
https://greatawakening.win/p/140cWvvhLk/nearly-100-of-people-55-and-olde/c/
Source for covid Vax Data: https://public.tableau.com/app/profile/phs.covid.19/viz/COVID-19DailyDashboard_15960160643010/Overview
Covid-19: Children born during the pandemic score lower on cognitive tests, study finds
Children born during the pandemic score markedly lower on standard measures of verbal, motor, and overall cognitive ability, US researchers have found.
In a longitudinal study of 672 children from Rhode Island that has run since 2011, those born after the pandemic began showed results on the Mullen scales of early learning that corresponded to an average IQ score of 78, a drop of 22 points from the average of previous cohorts.
The study, which was funded by the US National Institutes of Health is awaiting peer review before publication in JAMA Pediatrics. But a preprint copy is available online.1
The researchers have largely ruled out a direct effect of the virus, as mothers or children with a history of testing positive for covid-19 were excluded from the analysis. Instead, the authors say, reduced interaction with parents and less outdoor exercise are likely culprits, along with effects that occurred during pregnancy.
Other research has hinted at behavioural effects in children born during the pandemic, including a recent study from Italy.2
Children born in 2019 did not experience a decline in development scores during the pandemic. “Their trajectories of maturation were unaltered,” said lead author of the longitudinal study and paediatrician Sean Deoni of Brown University. “They seemed to be doing alright. It’s really affecting those born during the pandemic, whether through transference from their mother, what she’s experiencing during late term pregnancy, or during those crucial earliest months after birth.”
Scores among children born during the pandemic began to decline in 2020 in an early learning composite that measured fine and gross motor control, visual reception, and expressive and receptive language. But it was in 2021 that the developmental deficit became significant (P<0.001). The effect was larger in boys than in girls.
The strongest protective factor was higher maternal education, and mothers in the study population had more schooling than the US average, suggesting that results in less educated parts of the country could be “even more depressing,” said Deoni.
In terms of effect size, he said, “the closest thing we’ve seen in other research—and this is horrible, not a good comparison to be making—is the studies that were done of orphans in Romania. The effects of institutionalisation and lack of interaction on them were profound, but what we’re seeing here is on par with that.”
A push by Romanian dictator Nicolae Ceausescu to increase birth rates led to hundreds of thousands of children being abandoned to state orphanages, where many spent most of the day in cots, staring at the ceiling.3
While the Rhode Island study did not directly measure time spent interacting between family members, said Deoni, “we do have some preliminary data that we’re working on in a separate study using miniature recorders which the infants wear on their chest which measure the interaction between the caregiver and the child, and what we are seeing, anecdotally, is a significant depression in the number of words spoken to kids and, as you can imagine, a massive increase in TV exposure, and a decline in meaningful conversations. Time spent engaged with a caregiver is way down.”
