Short version:
Hillary’s people were deeply involved in dealing with the hidden assets of Ghadafi. He had been killed in a way that was made possible by the intervention of the Hillary State Department, and then her people were deeply involved in where the Ghadaffi assets went.
Instead of investigating this, Comey et al in the FBI did an investigation of Trump based on a bogus dossier drafted by very close associates of Hillary.
Remember her glee at Ghadaffi’s death saying “We came, We saw, He died!"
As released by the excellent investigative journalist, Paul Sperry:
@paulsperry_
BREAKING: Sid Blumenthal and Cody Shearer were on a quest to find and plunder Ghadhafi's gold after Hillary Clinton boasted of killing Ghadhafi and as they were exchanging Libyan "intelligence" with Clinton at the State Dept., yet the FBI never investigated possible quid pro quos.
https://mobile.twitter.com/paulsperry_/status/1171486149379903490
“The names we keep hearing are Sidney Blumenthal and Cody Shearer — people who have been around the Clintons as being a part of this. But I also think it’s kind of interesting because what it looks like is, they paid Steele to put together the dossier and told him what to put in,” Jordan said. “Talk about rigging the game and putting together a document that will serve your purposes as an opposition research document.”
“That is what the Clinton team did and then when you see names like Sidney Blumenthal coming up. We deposed this guy during the Benghazi hearings,” Congressman Jim Jordan continued. “
He has been with the Clintons forever. He was knee deep in the whole Libya, Benghazi story, particularly the story where they weren’t square with the American people about what was the actual catalyst of the attack, and they tried to blame it on video.”
https://dailycaller.com/2018/02/06/jim-jordan-benghazi-steele-dossier/
According to Zero Hedge recently made public FBI records reveal that the agency virtually ignored evidence from private GOP-backed sources about a scheme in which Hillary Clinton associates tried to exploit her position as Secretary of State in order to profit from the 2011 turmoil in Libya she helped to create, according to RealClearInvestigations.
The documents, provided to the FBI in June 2016 as the agency was kicking its Trump-Russia investigation into high gear, allege that Clinton confidant Sidney Blumenthal sent her “a series of detailed memos and reports about Libya,” which were intended as a “quid pro quo” which might help a post-Gaddafi Libya recover as much as $66 billion in offshore funds hidden by the slain strongman.
According to the private investigators funded by Judicial Watch: “Our evidence shows that Mr. Blumenthal was involved with a group of intelligence professionals seeking to repatriate asset[s] which were plundered and then exfiltrated by the [Gaddafi] family and hidden in various offshore localities.”
If successful, Blumenthal and associates “stood to gain a brokers’ cut of perhaps hundreds of millions of dollars.”
The private Libya inquiry leaves important issues unsettled. The documents do not include emails or other original source material to support the allegations within. While claiming to possess evidence that Blumenthal and his associates had contracts and offshore accounts to repatriate the money, the documents say “no concrete evidence” was found suggesting Clinton acted to support the effort.
Yet if verified, the files might shed light on why Clinton kept her emails, tens of thousands of which have gone missing, out of normal government communication channels.–RealClearInvestigations
The documents are labeled by the FBI as having been received on June 6, 2016 – a month before the first of Comey’s two exonerations of Hillary Clinton before the 2016 election.
This was roughly seven weeks before the FBI opened its counterintelligence probe of the Trump campaign based on nothing.
Read the rest of the report here.
https://www.realclearinvestigations.com/articles/2019/09/09/clinton-libya_and_trump-russia_a_tale_of_two_probes_and_the_fbi_120083.html
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2019/09/deep-state-fbi-given-hard-evidence-of-hillary-clinton-linked-66-billion-libya-scheme-launched-junk-investigation-against-trump-russia-hoax-instead/
Google is apparently not above the law after all…Facebook et al watching closely…
Google is now being investigated by 48 States Attorney Generals:
Texas will lead a joint state investigation into Google over antitrust concerns, state Attorney General Ken Paxton announces Monday.
The news follows the announcement of a joint state Facebook probe led by the attorney general of New York.
Google is also reportedly facing an antitrust probe from the U.S. Department of Justice.
Fifty attorneys general are joining an investigation into Google over possible antitrust violations, Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton, the initiative’s leader, announced Monday.
The news confirms reports last week about the bipartisan investigation into Google’s practices. The probe includes attorneys general from 48 states, the District of Columbia and Puerto Rico. California and Alabama are not involved in the probe, Paxton said at a press conference.
Other attorneys general at the media conference emphasized Google’s dominance in the ad market and use of consumer data.
“When there is no longer a free market or competition, this increases prices, even when something is marketed as free, and harms consumers,” said Florida Attorney General Ashley Moody, a Republican. “Is something really free if we are increasingly giving over our privacy information? Is something really free if online ad prices go up based on one company’s control?”
“It really is significant the fact that you’ve got the U.K., France, Australia, the European Commission looking at this, all indicate that this is a significant issue,” Peterson said.
The focus on Google and Facebook by the state attorneys general does not mean other tech giants such as Amazon and Apple will be free from scrutiny. Sources told the Journal last week that the investigations could expand to other companies.
https://www.cnbc.com/2019/09/09/texas-attorney-general-leads-google-antitrust-probe.html
Epstein did not die in his cell. He had been taken out of his cell hours before his death. Somebody (or some body) was then wheeled in later in a wheelchair and 911 was then called. (Was it really him in the wheelchair? Remember the physical discrepancies etc…)
"Jeffrey Epstein was removed from his prison cell to another part of the Metropolitan Correctional Center hours before his death, casting serious doubt about the narrative surrounding the pedophile’s reported suicide, federal law enforcement sources said.
The shocking revelations, if true, shatter the Justice Department’s narrative that Epstein hung himself in his cell with a prison bed sheet.
The FBI is investigating Epstein’s death which now includes reports that Epstein was taken to a different part of the prison before MCC officials made a 911 call to the New York Fire Department.
Epstein may have been returned to his cell in a wheelchair shortly before that 911 call was made.“There are reports he was in a wheelchair and slumped over coming back to his cell after approximately 5 am,” a federal law enforcement source said.
MCC officials called 911 at approximately 6:40 am.
“If he wasn’t in his cell, why would they need to check?,” a federal law enforcement source said. “That makes no sense.”
Federal sources said the media, including the New York Times, have worked to craft a narrative that Epstein was ignored by prison guards who failed to inspect his cell prior to his death. Prison guards even fell asleep, according to the Times’ reporting. That information went viral with hundreds of media outlets reprinting that story, based on the New York Times’ reporting.
However, that now appears to be questionable information at best. But dubious or not it has served to create the suicide narrative."
https://truepundit.com/epstein-did-not-die-in-his-prison-cell-feds/
28% of Democrats Say It Should Be Illegal to Join the NRA [And 15% of Republicans!]
Rasmussen Reports ^ | September 09, 2019 | Rasmussen Reports
Posted on 9/10/2019, 2:05:26 AM by familyop
The National Rifle Association is America’s largest gun rights organization with more than five million members. But a sizable number of Democrats views it as a terrorist group and believes it should be against the law for Americans to belong to pro-gun rights organizations like the NRA.
Following several recent mass shootings, officials in San Francisco declared the NRA a domestic terrorist organization. The latest Rasmussen Reports national telephone and online survey finds that nearly one-out-of-three Likely Democratic Voters (32%) favor declaring the gun rights group a terrorist organization in the community where they live. Fourteen percent (14%) of Republicans and 20% of voters not affiliated with either major party agree. (To see survey question wording, click here.)
Twenty-eight percent (28%) of Democrats say Americans should be prohibited by law from belonging to pro-gun rights organizations like the NRA, a view shared by 15% of Republicans and 10% of unaffiliateds.
Among all likely voters, 23% favor declaring the NRA a terrorist organization in their home community, while 18% think it should be against the law to belong to pro-gun rights groups like the NRA.
Only 13% believe NRA members are more likely to commit a crime with a gun. A plurality (47%) says members of the group are less likely to commit such a crime, while 28% think the level of gun crime by NRA members is about the same as in the population at large. Twelve percent (12%) are undecided.
http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/current_events/gun_control/28_of_democrats_say_it_should_be_illegal_to_join_the_nra
NRA sues San Francisco over terrorist declaration
AP ^ | Sept. 9, 2019 | LISA MARIE PANE
Posted on 9/10/2019, 6:21:04 AM by PROCON
The National Rifle Association sued San Francisco on Monday over the city's recent declaration that the gun-rights lobby is a "domestic terrorist organization."
The lawsuit, filed in U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California, accuses city officials of violating the gun lobby's free speech rights for political reasons and says the city is seeking to blacklist anyone associated with the NRA. It asks the court to step in "to instruct elected officials that freedom of speech means you cannot silence or punish those with whom you disagree."
(Excerpt) Read more at abcnews.go.com … https://abcnews.go.com/US/wireStory/nra-sues-san-francisco-terrorist-declaration-65498939
A Relevant Blast from the Past:
The Disgraced but currently combative Muslim CIA Director under Obama Did not use a bible or Koran to be sworn in. Instead he used a copy of the Constitution that was missing the Bill of Rights.
"Muslim Central Intelligence Agency Director John Brennan took his oath in a swearing ceremony that was highly unusual. Brennan was not sworn in on a Bible. He was sworn in by Vice President Joe Biden on a “first draft” of the Constitution, which does not contain the Bill of Rights.
That means, when Brennan vowed to protect and defend the Constitution, he was swearing on one that did not include the First, Fourth, Fifth, or Sixth Amendments — or any of the other Amendments now included in our Constitution. The Bill of Rights did not become part of our Constitution until 1791, 4 years after the Constitution that Brennan took his oath on."
https://freedomoutpost.com/john-brennan-sworn-in-on-constitution-without-bill-of-rights-not-bible/
Today he literally threatens President Trump:
BRENNAN: Jim Comey is far more decent, ethical, honest, competent, & patriotic than you could ever hope to be. It is only because the AG & Republican Senators refuse to put country above party that you are not in a world of trouble & hurt. But their protective cocoon is only temporary…” Brennan said in response to Trump’s tweet hammering Comey.
— John O. Brennan (@JohnBrennan) August 29, 2019
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2019/08/brennan-defends-partner-in-crime-comey-following-release-of-doj-ig-report-fires-off-ominous-warning-to-president-trump/
What does the Red Cross and Planned Parenthood do with human tissue and blood products?
The laws generally allow the hospital to have control according to their policies and thus ownership of the placenta. Oregon is unusual in that it protects the right of the mother to own it:
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1IFz9ePkYlllxSlckq679EF3Iuy44RTB3h_uU23pU6m0/edit?hl=en&hl=en#gid=0
"One of the participants [in a reality show] was having a discussion with another. When asked about his line of work, he said "I work in medical sales. I sell placentas". He was asked how much they go for and said "Technically, you're not allowed to sell your own placenta."
He then went on to say that the price for a whole placenta and umbilica cord is between $40,000 - $45,000.
NOW it makes sense why states like New York are allowing abortions up until the moment of birth. It's quite a profitable business.
Okay - if a woman can't sell her placenta - then WHO does? WHO nets the profit? The abortion provider? The state?
The medical sales rep said something to the effect that it benefits so many people. Likely referring to stem cells and medical research. He was hesitant to say, however, how much they sold for. After he told the price, he said "Crazy, huh?" That's one word for it..."
Some relevant comments:
"What do hospitals do with the placentas after birth? I don't understand this. Medical waste should belong to the patient. I had my gallbladder removed, it contained one GIANT stone so I asked my doctor if I could have it. He said no, there are rules against it. I did the same thing when we circumcised our son (I TRIED TO KEEP HIM INTACT but his father insisted). They wouldn't let us keep our baby's foreskin either. I really didn't want them to make some rich bitch's face cream out of it. How do our body parts not belong to us but hospitals can make a profit off of them?"
"Just had a thought about China's now discontinued 'One-Child' policy from the 1980's, which was bought in to reduce future population growth. Just imagine the number of fetuses aborted over there. The amount of potential evil and profit by the Chinese Elites."
https://voat.co/v/QRV/3420696
Is this where they get the placentas for “Placenta Lasagna” served at the Cannibal Club in Los Angeles? http://cannibalclub.org/cuisine.html. http://cannibalclub.org/staff.html. Yuk!
In case you wondered just how far some Muslims will go - some Shia Muslims actually cut their own little children heads to celebrate Asura:
Babies, children and adults were covered in blood as Muslims used knives to slice open their heads during Ashura.
Shia Muslims participate in Ashura every year to mourn the death of their ‘prophet’ Muhammad’s grandson, Hussein Ali.
At least 31 people were killed in a stampede at the Ashura festival in Iraq and more than 100 were injured.
Ashura, once only celebrated in the Middle East and parts of Africa has now spread to Western nations as Muslims flex their dominance and take over the streets in various Western cities.
Muslims in the West including in Toronto, London and Sidney flexed their dominance and marched down the streets to celebrate Ashura.
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2019/09/babies-covered-in-blood-as-muslims-use-knives-to-slice-open-their-heads-during-ashura-festival-videos/
Tom Hanks’ movie about Fred Rogers has been moved up to mid October - which appears to be when the stuff will hit the fan hard on the liberal elites.
"It’s a beautiful day in the neighborhood because Sony debuted the first trailer for its Mister Rogers movie starring Tom Hanks. “A Beautiful Day in the Neighborhood” is inspired by a real-life friendship between Fred Rogers (Hanks) and Tom Junod (Matthew Rhys), a cynical journalist assigned to write a profile of the long-running television host.
“This piece will be for an issue about heroes,” Rhys’ character tells Rogers in the new clip. “Do you consider yourself a hero?” He responds, “We are trying to give the world positive ways of dealing with their feelings.” The feel-good film highlights the important of kindness in a skeptical world."
Tom Hanks is pretending to be a saint. He isn’t. He has been accused of having used an under-age sex slave. https://twitter.com/SaRaAshcraft/status/937726541894705153 He has been an active Hillary supporter. https://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-4536308/Tom-Hanks-cuddles-Hillary-Clinton-charity-event.html He narrated Obama’s re-election campaign documentary. https://deadline.com/2012/03/will-this-tom-hanks-and-davis-guggenheim-video-help-president-obama-245122/#!
Here he is with Oprah apparently having been beaten and involved in some sort of submission thing. White Privilege penance or something else?:
Not all actors are vile:
