top of page
  • Dagny

Big News!

Shadow Gate

Millennial Millie was just arrested on a “Secret Indictment by a Grand Jury”.  Even now she has not heard why as she and her husband are in jail, and is threatened with having their children taken away by the government.

Here is the arrest:

’She was about to release a movie called ShadowGate.  In fact she was uploading it when the arrest happened.

According to one supporter who shared the video:

This is the Most Amazing investigative documentary I have ever seen. Produced by Millie Weaver an Independent / Info Wars journalist.  Millie deserves a Pulitzer Prize, but instead was arrested Friday along with her husband on burglary charges and has been indicted by a grand jury seated in Ohio.  There is more important information contained in this report than I have seen in all the years I have been following internet news.

Here is the preview for the movie:

What was she arrested for?  “Burglary”.  A secret grand jury supposedly indicted her on burglary?  Since when does a grand jury get involved in a burglary case? It just so happens that she was uploading a movie that is devastating to the Deep State.   Multiple people have grabbed and posted the movie to keep it from being taken down.

Here is the movie:

90 minutes in length.

She works as an independent contributor to Alex Jones’ InfoWars. Alex Jones has found out everything he can currently and says even Millie doesn’t know what it is about.  The charges are said to be domestic violence, burglary, and tampering with evidence.  She and her husband are both in jail and will probably be arraigned in court on Monday.  She is also being threatened with having her children taken away by Child Protective Services in a hearing as well. She was literally uploading the movie (which she has been working for over a year) when the officer arrived and arrested her and her husband. Here is Alex Jones in a 14 minute video on the Millie situation:

Now there is public evidence that Seth Rich was communicating with Wikileaks Julian Assange shortly before Seth Rich's murder!

Fox News knew ( and withheld ) that Federal Investigators had actually read the emails between Seth Rich and Julian Assange! This blows up the whole farce that the DNC was hacked, and that Seth Rich’s murder was a botched robbery.  The DNC and its allies are now implicated in his murder: Emails were just released related to the Seth Rich case.  The documents relate to a FOX News report that was eventually scrubbed (spiked) .

A Federal Investigator claimed he had seen and read emails between Seth Rich and WikiLeaks.  The spiked FOX News report claimed that someone at the DNC was preventing the case from moving forward.  Also, the report noted that two men were found on camera shooting Rich:

See video below where Julian Assange from WikiLeaks discusses Seth Rich:

Remember back on August 8th 2016 (4years ago)

Julian Assange pretty much admits Seth Rich was working with WikiLeaks in this interview on Dutch TV.. Clinesmith Cracks!

As someone in the middle of all this skullduggery he is in a position to implicate everyone involved.

Clinesmith "...I have initiated the destruction of the Republic!"

Former FBI lawyer Kevin Clinesmith will plead guilty to one count of making a false statement regarding his involvement in the agency's actions against the Trump campaign during the 2016 US election, according to the Associated Press.

In November, the New York Times revealed that Clinesmith was under criminal investigation for allegedly doctoring materials used to obtain renewals of the Carter Page surveillance warrant. Clinesmith-who worked on both the Hillary Clinton email investigation and the Russia probe, was part of Special Counsel Robert Mueller's team, and interviewed Trump campaign advisor George Papadopoulos. Among the general discussion of political issues by FBI Attorney 2 (Clinesmith), we identified three instant message exchanges that raised concerns of potential bias. The first of these exchanges was on October 28, 2016, shortly after Comey’s October 28 letter to Congress that effectively announced the reopening of the Midyear investigation. FBI Attorney 2 sent similar messages to four different FBI employees. The timestamps of these messages are included below. The messages stated:

After Clinesmith’s name was released in November 2019, that on page 445 of the DOJ’s IG report on Hillary Clinton’s emails, there is a discussion of what Attorney 2 (Clinesmith) from the FBI texted on October 28, 2016 –

FBI Attorney 2 (Clinesmith) sent similar messages to four different FBI employees. The timestamps of these messages are included below. The messages stated:

13:44:42, to FBI Employee A: “I mean, I never really liked the Republic anyway.”

13:44:52, to FBI Employee B: “I mean, I never really liked the Republic anyway.”

14:01:52, to FBI Employee C: “As I have initiated the destruction of the republic.… Would you be so kind as to have a coffee with me this afternoon?”

15:28:50, to FBI Employee D: “I’m clinging to small pockets of happiness in the dark time of the Republic’s destruction “Something tells me that Mr. Clinesmith knows where the bodies are buried, and if I were in the FBI working on Crossfire Hurricane, I would be very worried right now,” Graham, a close Trump ally and chairman of the Senate judiciary committee, told Fox News’ Hannity on Friday. Peace is breaking out in the Middle East thanks to Trump and his team: Trump tweet:

HUGE breakthrough today! Historic Peace Agreement between our two GREAT friends, Israel and the United Arab Emirates!Joint Statement of the United States, the State of Israel, and the United Arab Emirates Israel and UAE reach historic peace deal The Jerusalem Post ^ | 8/13/2020 

Israel and the United Arab Emirates reached a historic peace deal on Thursday that will lead to a full normalization of diplomatic relations between the two Middle Eastern nations in an agreement that U.S. President Donald Trump helped broker. (Excerpt) Read more at ... Top Democrats Rep. Rashida Tlaib and Obama Security Advisor Ben Rhodes joined the Iranian regime and Turkey in condemning the historic peace deal between the UAE and Israel.

Rashida Tlaib is an open anti-Israel activist and squad member in the Democrat Party.

Iran, Turkey, @brhodes and @RashidaTlaib United in criticizing a Peace deal. I

The possibility of returning to the Obama-Biden foreign policy days has our Middle East partners in fear. 

— Richard Grenell (@RichardGrenell) August 15, 2020

The Jerusalem Post reported:  Iran highlighted Palestinian opposition to the UAE agreement, showing photos of Palestinians insulting the crown prince of the UAE and saying, “the road to Jerusalem is paved with the blood of our martyrs.”

Hamas also slammed the move by Israel, the US and the UAE, claiming that relations and normalization with Israel were a red line and a betrayal of Palestinians. A Hamas representative told Tasnim News in Iran that the deal was a betrayal of the “first prayer place” of Muslims, referring to Jerusalem and al-Aqsa mosque.

Blocked from going to church, people are being baptized in a fountain in a park:

People gathered around Washington Square Park in New York City to be baptized in the park fountain, since places of worship were closed.

Massive destruction to crops in the Midwest:

Iowa Gov. Kim Reynolds (R) said the storm, which had hurricane-force winds up to 112 mph, destroyed at least one-third of the entire state's crops. More than 10 million acres were completely flattened, leading Reynolds to say she thinks the storm should qualify for federal disaster declaration. The Washington Postreports between 180 and 270 million bushels of corn were likely damaged, shortly before harvesting usually begins in September. FDA does the unthinkably wrong thing!

Remember that huge and well designed study at the Ford Health Center that proved HCQ is safe and effective? Well, this week the FDA banned them from using it to treat Covid!: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is refusing to allowthe Henry Ford Health System to use hydroxychloroquine as a COVID-19 treatment, despite the fact that the medical provider produced a peer-reviewed scientific study showing its efficacy. “The U.S. Food and Drug Administration informed us that it would not grant our request for an emergency use authorization for hydroxychloroquine for a segment of COVID-19 patients meeting very specific criteria,” said Dr. Adnan Munkarah, Henry Ford’s executive vice president and chief clinical officer, in a statement. Here is a good summary of the findings at the Ford Center and others:

Evidence is in: Hydroxychloroquine works! By Howard Richman

"The media is doing its best to ignore the solid new evidence that hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) works. Although they claim to be pro-science, they only report scientific studies that agree with their narrative. Although they claim that black lives matter to them, they purposely keep knowledge about successful treatments away from COVID-19 patients, a disproportionate number of whom are black. Here are some details of the two new studies that almost all of them are ignoring:

  1. Henry Ford Health System. Last week, the International Journal of Infectious Diseasesreported that hydroxychloroquine cuts the death rate in half when it is administered to hospitalized COVID-19 patients soon after they are admitted. The retrospective study of 2,541 patients was conducted by the Henry Ford Health System in Detroit Michigan. Only 13% of the patients who were given HCQ died as compared to 26% who were not given HCQ. HCQ worked whether or not it was given with the antibiotic azithromycin, but it appeared to work slightly better with azithromycin. Key to the study was early treatment with HCQ, with 91% in the HCQ group starting that medication within 48 hours of hospital admission.

  2. Mount Sinai Hospital. Also last week, Nature Reviews Immunologypublished the results of the small but ideal type of experiment (a double-blind, randomized clinical trial) conducted by Mount Sinai Hospital in New York which found that 0 of 31 patients in the HCQ group progressed from mild to severe as compared to 4 of 31 patients in the control group.

  3. The media is also ignoring the May 8 study of 932 patients by the New York University Grossman School of Medicinewhich compared the HCQ/azithromycin treatment with the HCQ/azithromycin/zinc treatment. NYU found that the addition of zinc sulfate pills to the HCQ/azithromycin treatment reduced the death rate from 23% to 13%, but only if given before the patients got so sick that they required intensive care."

"If these results are extrapolated, they show that early treatment with HCQ could prevent about 50% of the deaths from COVID-19, and the addition of zinc sulfate could further reduce the death rate by an additional 20%. For every 100 patients who are currently dying without effective pharmacological treatment, only 30 would die if they were treated early with the the HCQ/azithromycin/zinc combination." Just a reminder from way back in May... HCQ is now clearly and publicly supported by a professor of epidemiology at Yale: Harvey Risch, M.D., Ph.D., is a professor of epidemiology at Yale School of Public Health.: Excerpt: As of Wednesday, some 165,000 people in the United States have diedfrom COVID-19. I have made the case in the American Journal of Epidemiologyand in Newsweek that people who have a medical need to be treated can be treated early and successfully with hydroxychloroquine, zinc, and antibiotics such as azithromycin or doxycycline. I have also argued that these drugs are safe and have made that case privately to the Food and Drug Administration. The pushback has been furious. Dr. Anthony Fauci has implied that I am incompetent, notwithstanding my hundreds of highly regarded, methodologically relevant publications in peer-reviewed scientific literature. A group of my Yale colleagues has publicly intimated that I am a zealot who is perpetrating a dangerous hoax and conspiracy theory. I have been attacked in news articles by journalists who, ignorant of the full picture, have spun hit pieces from cherry-picked sources.

These personal attacks are a dangerous distraction from the real issue of hydroxychloroquine's effectiveness, which is solidly grounded in both substantial evidence and appropriate medical decision-making logic. Much of the evidence is presented in my articles.

To date, there are no studies whatsoever, published or in pre-print, that provide scientific evidence against the treatment approach for high-risk outpatients that I have described. None. Assertions to the contrary, whether by Fauci, the FDA, or anyone else, are without foundation. They constitute misleading and toxic disinformation.

What do you need to know to evaluate these smears against hydroxychloroquine? The first thing to understand is that COVID-19 has two main stages. At the first stage, it is a flu-like illness. That illness will not kill you. If you are a high-risk patient and begin treatment immediately, you will almost certainly be done with it in a few days. When not treated, high-risk patients may progress. The virus then causes severe pneumonia and attacks many organs, including the heart. In this second stage, hydroxychloroquine is not effective. So, if you are told that hydroxychloroquine doesn’t work, ask this question: In which patients? Does it not work in those who have just started to have symptoms, or those sick enough to require hospitalization? The second thing to know is that most low-risk patients survive without treatment. Low risk means you are under age 60 and have no chronic conditions such as diabetes, obesity, and hypertension, have no past treatment for cancer, are not immunocompromised, etc. High risk means you are over 60 or you have one or more of those chronic conditions. High-risk patients need immediate treatment when they first show symptoms. One should not wait for the COVID-19 test result, which can take days and can be wrong. Again, when Fauci and others say that randomized controlled trials show no benefit for hydroxychloroquine, you must ask: In which group of patients? Ivermectin ( commonly sold as a wormer for livestock, people and animals ) is showing great and important results in treating Covid: One of the things that we’ve learned about COVID-19 is that HCQ + AZ + Zinc is devastating to the disease early on. But later, when the disease has run rampant, it’s ineffective. So, there is a need for something to help critically ill COVID-19 patients.

It turns out that Ivermectin is VERY efficacious when patients are in critical condition. Even people on ventilators are being saved by this drug. Guess what Ivermectin is? It’s an anti-parasite drug. So, an anti-parasite drug, HCQ, works early in the disease process and another anti-parasite drug, Ivermectin, works late in the disease process. The more we learn about this disease, the more it confounds us and destroys conventional thinking about it. Ivermectin was invented about 23 years after chloroquine. And, like chloroquine, it’s generic and cheap. Can you even imagine how frustrating this is to the big pharma companies? The two drugs that seem to defeat COVID-19 are both generic and cheap and provide them with no profits. The buzz in the research community is remdesivir. But remdesivir seems to be failing to fulfill its promise. It was originally designed for Ebola, but the one trial that was conducted revealed that more people died who took the drug than those who didn’t. The problem is that one of the side effects of remdesivir seems to be liver damage, which could prevent it from ever becoming an approved treatment. And now a leaked study shows no benefit for COVID-19 patients being treated with remdesivir. Funny how the worm turns, huh? If the solution to COVID-19 is two generic drugs, who’s to say it isn’t the solution for MANY coronaviruses? And that is news that big pharma hates to hear. So now you know why the pushback on HCQ has been so vociferous.

Bill Gates Dissembles!:

Want to watch Bill Gates start squirming weasel wording when asked a solid question about the safety and efficacy of his vaccine?   Here you go: Here is real idiocy:  Forcing people to wear masks for meetings ONLINE! Wisconsin’s Department of Natural Resources, told its employees that effective August 1, they would have to wear a mask - even for teleconferences. 

How gullible do bureaucrats think we are?

If the Post Office Union endorses Biden then how can we trust them with ballots?  Not at all!!! The 300,000-member National Association of Letter Carriers said on Friday that the union’s executive council had endorsed Democrat Joe Biden for president, warning “the very survival” of the U.S. Postal Service is at stake. Joe Biden is sniffing his dead son’s widow’s hair at the funeral….  Creeped out enough yet?

Update and Correction Regarding the Quote from Kamala Harris: "Kamala promises to hunt down Trump supporters if they win…" Is this a genuine quote which I cited in a previous post? I cannot currently confirm it. Of course the usual suspects are denying it and saying it was from a satirical website, but they cannot agree on which one. Furthermore, it sounds so much like things she has said that it is not far enough out to qualify as humorous satire. I cannot however find any recording of her saying it. I can confirm with video that she did "joke" about killing President Trump, Pence and Jeff Sessions. She's that kind of person. Did she say the quote? I do not know. I apologize for not being able to confirm it before posting. In this modern age, if she did say it, there would be an intense effort by the Tech Tyrants to scrub it from the internet. I cannot for sure tell if that has happened.

Meanwhile there are huge mountains of easily verified damning facts moving like an avalanche down on Kamala Harris: 1) Dinesh D'Sousa: Kamala Harris is directly descended from one of the largest slaveowners in Jamaica, Hamilton Brown—there is a even a town named after him, Brown Town. So doesn’t it follow she’s a beneficiary, not a victim, of slavery? 2) Kamala Harris made a joke of killing President Trump, Jeff Sessions, and/or Vice President Mike Pence.

DeGeneres asked Harris a series of lighthearted questions, ranging from whether she has any tattoos (no) to her celebrity crush (Tito Jackson).

Harris was asked whether she’d rather be stuck in an elevator with President Trump, Vice President Mike Pence or then-Attorney General Jeff Sessions.

After a theatrical eye-roll, Harris responded, “Does one of us have to come out alive?” Both host and guest — as well as the audience — found this uproarious. 3) She covered up and thus enabled the Catholic Clergy to continue sexually abusing children:

“Far from protecting victims, they argued, the cover-up was actually protecting the abusers by keeping their alleged crimes secret.”

Even outside the cases affected by the high court’s statute of limitations ruling, in 13 years as San Francisco’s district attorney or California’s attorney general, Harris didn’t bring a single case against Catholic clergy accused of sex abuse.

During that time, Schweizer notes, at least 50 cities took action against priests accused of sexual assault. Furthermore, The Intercept reported Harris’ office refused to cooperate with victims as they pursued civil claims against the Catholic Church.

Victims who talked to Fang said that during her seven-year tenure as San Francisco’s district attorney, “Harris’s office did not proactively assist in civil cases against clergy sex abuse and ignored requests by activists and survivors to access the cache of investigative files that could have helped them secure justice.”

Yet, Harris has repeatedly touted her record of prosecuting sex crimes — child sex crimes in particular — during the presidential race and other campaigns.

The victims of clerical sex abuse in the San Francisco Archdiocese have a different view of that record.

“It went from Terence Hallinan going hundred miles an hour, full speed ahead, after the Catholic Church to Kamala Harris doing absolutely nothing and taking it backwards hundred miles an hour,” said Piscitelli, who a jury found had been sexually abused by a priest during his time at Salesian College Preparatory high school between 1969 and 1971.

While Piscitelli had been meeting with Hallinan’s office, Harris cut off meetings as soon as she took over. This wasn’t an uncommon story.

“I remember Kamala Harris,” Dominic De Lucca, who says he was raped by a priest at age 12, told The Intercept. “She didn’t want to have any meetings.”

“She wanted the public to think this is an issue that happened years ago, that it doesn’t happen anymore. Let’s just move on.”

Harris didn’t comment on The Intercept’s 2019 report and there doesn’t seem to be any concrete reason she decided against releasing the files despite the fact that victims wanted her to.

That just leaves speculation — and there’s plenty of that.

“The Roman Catholic Church is very powerful and I think they didn’t want to step on any toes, especially in San Francisco,” De Lucca told The Intercept.

If you want speculation of a more sinister bent, Schweizer noted that Harris received a substantial amount of money from sources close to the Catholic Church during the 2003 campaign.

“Harris had no particular ties to the Catholic Church or Catholic organizations, but the money still came in large, unprecedented sums. Lawyer Joseph Russoniello represented the church on a wide variety of issues, including the handling of the church abuse scandal. He served on the Catholic Church’s National Review Board (NRB) of the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops,” Schweizer wrote in “Profiles in Corruption.”

“The purpose of the NRB was to review Catholic Church abuse cases. Russoniello was also a partner in the San Francisco law firm Cooley Godward. Russoniello donated the maximum amount by law to her campaign, $1,250, and his law firm added another $2,250. He also sat on Harris’s advisory council when she was San Francisco district attorney.

“Another law firm, Bingham McCutcheon, which handled legal matters for the archdiocese concerning Catholic Charities, donated $2,825, the maximum allowed. Curiously, Bingham McCutcheon had only donated to two other candidates running for office in San Francisco before, for a total of $650. As with Russoniello, their support was unusual.”

Whatever the case, there’s no obvious explanation for why a prosecutor who unseated a progressive incumbent for not being tough enough on crime would, upon taking over a DA’s office that was aggressively pursuing the San Francisco Archdiocese over a potential sexual abuse cover-up, drop the entire thing. 4) She prosecuted people for smoking marijuana at the same time she was smoking marijuana and laughed about it.

She prosecuted the helpless masses while letting the politically connected walk.YouTube One of her more violent 'released offenders' went on to commit murder.

She is known for withholding exculpatory evidence (facts proving innocence) including a case where a man was on death row.

Here she laughsYouTube about her own use of cannabis while sending gentle people to prison.

She consistently prosecuted for politics, never for Justice. :  Giuliani rips Kamala Harris over her criminal justice record - YouTube :  A play-by-play of Kamala Harris admitting she smoked weed - YouTube

5) She used her office as AG to persecute people who disagreed with Global Warming.

Harris was a leader in the junta of Democratic state attorneys general that attempted to criminalize dissent in the matter of global warming, using her office’s investigatory powers to target and harass non-profit policy groups while she and her counterpart in New York attempted to shake down Exxon on phony fraud cases. Until she was stopped by a federal court, Harris was laying subpoenas on organizations such as the Americans for Prosperity Foundation, a conservative-leaning group that is critical of Democratic global-warming proposals. She demanded private information that the organizations were not legally obliged to disclose, including financial information and donor lists, in order to be able to subject the supporters of right-leaning groups to legal and financial harassment. This was, as a federal judge confirmed, an obvious and unquestionable violation of the First Amendment. It was also a serious abuse of power. 6) How extreme is Kamala Harris? Pretty extreme. There are various measures for these things, but according to Progressive Punch (“Leading with the Left”), Kamala Harris is the fourth farthest-left of any senator with a score of 96.76 percent out of 100 on “crucial votes,” despite moderating very slightly in the period when she was running for president. Elizabeth Warren is fifth, Kirsten Gillibrand is sixth, and Bernie Sanders is tenth. 

SOURCE URL: Kamala Harris Lies Repeatedly in First Speech as Biden’s Running Mate  National Review ^| August 12, 2020 | Kyle Smith  In her first speech since Joe Biden selected her as his running mate, Senator Kamala Harris told multiple lies. To wit: 

“The president’s mismanagement of the pandemic has plunged us into the worst economic crisis since the Great Depression,” Harris said. 

False. The pandemic and its associated lockdowns, not the president, are responsible for the economic contraction. Donald Trump is not the president of the euro zone, which suffered through an even more dire economic contraction in the second quarter: minus 40.3 percent, on an annualized basis, as against minus 32.9 percent in the US. The U.K. suffered a contraction of 59.8 percent, also on an annualized basis. Donald Trump is not the prime minister of the United Kingdom.

See this link to go down the list... Just a reminder: The Constitution says Kamala Harris cannot be Vice President! Newsweek chickened out from their article earlier in the week where an op ed claimed that Senator Kamala Harris doesn’t qualify to be Vice President of the United States. Unfortunately for Harris, there is still no evidence her parents were US citizens when she was born.

57 views0 comments

Recent Posts

See All


bottom of page