Picking Sides Before the Battle
Here is a worthy piece of well done reporting by CNN in 2006 - back before they lost their integrity compass:
(Twitter calls it "sensitive content" so you have to click on "view" to see it.)
It was re-tweeted by Trump this morning. CNN must feel ashamed of what they have become.
Republicans in the House join the fight:
106 Republican Representatives have joined in filing a Motion for Leave to File a Brief of Amicus Curiae in Support of Plaintiff’s Motion for Leave to File a Bill of Complaint and Motion for a Preliminary Injunction
"This brief amicus curiae presents the concern ofamici as Members of Congress, shared by untold millions of their constituents, that the unconstitutional irregularities involved in the 2020 presidential election cast doubt upon its outcome and the integrity of the American system of elections."
Read it for yourself here:
These states filed in support of the Fraudulent Democrat States (the Defendants):
MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE AND BRIEF FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA AND THE STATES AND TERRITORIES OF CALIFORNIA, COLORADO, CONNECTICUT, DELAWARE, GUAM, HAWAII, ILLINOIS, MAINE, MARYLAND, MASSACHUSETTS, MINNESOTA, NEVADA, NEW JERSEY, NEW MEXICO, NEW YORK, NORTH CAROLINA, OREGON, RHODE ISLAND, VERMONT, VIRGINIA, U.S. VIRGIN ISLANDS, AND WASHINGTON AS AMICI CURIAE IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANTS AND IN OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE A BILL OF COMPLAINT
Battles within states is occurring:
REPORT: The Idaho Lt Governor JaniceMcGeachin & State Legislators From Idaho Have Filed An Amicus Brief With The Supreme Court Just Hours After The Idaho Attorney General Refused To Offer Support.
Alaska Governor says they will join Texas Supreme Court lawsuit against Pennsylvania, Michigan, Georgia, and Wisconsin!
Pennsylvania versus Pennsylvania:
The Pennsylvania House joined the case in support of Texas.
Good Summary but does not cover Sidney Powell or Lin Wood:
Here’s where POTUS stands with SCOTUS
Posted on December 10, 2020
Since this story has received little coverage in the media, I wanted to “brief” you on what is going on at The Supreme Court of the US with the election.
The first case is the PA state representative Michael Kelly’s suit against mail-in ballots. Associate Justice Samuel Alito denied a hearing for emergency relief after all parties filed their briefs. The case however is continuing .
Secondly, we have the action brought by Texas’ Republican Attorney General Ken Paxton filed on Dec. 7th. This suits alleges that the four battleground states of Pennsylvania, Georgia, Michigan and Wisconsin changed election laws unconstitutionally by not going through the state legislature. These actions therefore harmed Texans right to a free and fair election. The president — through his new lawyer constitutional scholar John Eastman — have filed to be considered an intervenor in the suit. An intervenor is a non-party wishing to join an ongoing litigation. The intervenor must show how they were harmed and the high court can decide whether to allow that status or not.
Also 17 (hmm) states have filed amicus briefs in support of the Texas suit. The states that backed the suit are: MO, AL, AR, FL, NE, ND, OK, IN, KS, LA, MS, MT, SC, SD, TN, UT and WV.
(Add in AZ, AK and ID taking it to 21)
On Thursday at 9 AM Pennsylvania, Georgia, Michigan, and Wisconsin are expected to file their responses to the court. Since this is an original case — not ruling on a lower court appeal — all nine justices will weigh in on whether to let this case go forward.
The Texas case does not allege voter fraud or rigged voting systems. It is strictly a constitutional case where governors or other state officials other than legislators put in new voting measures just prior to the Nov. 3 presidential election.
Maybe BLM learned something from this?
The official Black Lives Matter movement erupted Wednesday after none of its leaders were invited to a high-profile meeting with presumptive President-elect Joe Biden.
“Joe Biden, Kamala Harris, and Rep. Cedric Richmond met with several civil rights groups yesterday. @blklivesmatter — as the largest social and justice movement in history — was not invited,” the organization vented on Twitter, following that up with complaints that BLM was vital to Biden and therefore deserved to be invited.
“The night of their victory, we sent @joebiden and @kamalaharris a letter requesting a meeting. It has now been 32 days and we have yet to receive a response. To set up a meeting with civil rights leaders, without BLM, is unacceptable,” the group tweeted.
“The civil rights movement of the 21st century involves BLM. To leave us out is to ignore the millions of people who brought the Biden Harris victory home.@JoeBiden @KamalaHarris we are watching, we are waiting, and we are tired of waiting.”
In case you missed this:
This blatant case of "Mockingbird Media" proves to even the most indoctrinate skeptic that the media has been feeding them a script... A good wake up call for those still in the media bubble:
Voter Fraud Geography and Economics:
Consider this: Big cities are where the big money is and it makes financial sense for companies like Dominion, Smartmatic, and Hart Intercivic to make deals with politicians to guarantee elections there. Whichever company can deliver the election will get the contract to supply voting machines.
This is true of Republican and Democrat politicians, although big cities are usually Democrat, and Republicans are usually more honest - and thus losing in big cities.
It's not strictly red versus blue or cities versus rural - its rigged elections versus free and legal elections. In general it is big "blue" counties dominated illegally by Democrat crooks versus the rest of us. This below is roughly equivalent to a voter fraud crime map:
2016 election data:
Centers of money and power are where it is worth it for companies like Dominion to make a deal. How many of the blue areas are held by illegitimate criminals who bought their victories - usually mysteriously overnight and with a narrow margin... just enough to win with ~ 51% etc?
If there's video you like, it may be disappearing soon. Here is an easy way - tested by Thomas Sayre - to grab videos and save them on your computer.
Thomas: This seems to make grabbing youtube videos easy.