Mommy takes Manhattan
- Dagny
- Nov 12, 2025
- 5 min read
Empathy is usually a good thing.
It is love.
It is a mammalian thing. We see it in the way mammals care for their young. We see it in our own lives as we look out for one another as parents or as members of our community.
It makes sense - empathy - especially in mothers - helps assure the child will be cared for and reach successful adulthood.
Total lack of empathy leads to sociopathy.
Without empathy it's a reptile brain. Ruthless.
Sometimes empathy is a problem though. Warrior mindset has little to no mercy for the opponent. There is an us vs them mindset that is needed to win in a battle for survival.
It is also a problem if it is used by unscrupulous manipulators.
If not used for reproduction or defense of the family, nation or tribe, empathy and sympathy can be diverted and used for other purposes.
It can be exploited for bad purposes.
An example of this is talking women into displacing mothering instincts into liberal causes. This is even more easy to exploit if the woman can't reproduce and become a parent. The frustrated latent instinct is exploited to manipulate the woman. She will "momma bear" seek to destroy the threat to those who she seeks to "mother".
Who can't reproduce? Classically the Democrat base of white liberal women and these:
lesbian or
ugly or
mentally ill or
trained to hate men, or
belief in global warming, or
career fixation, or
abortion pressure, or
poverty, or
malnourished brains, or
addicted, or
distracted from reproduction, or
too busy earning a living, or
trans...
These are the people who are on the left.
They are pushed in this direction on purpose by those who would exploit them.
It's all about reproduction and empathy diversion.
Look at who voted for Mamdani.
Look at the No Kings demographic.
🇺🇸 American blogger criticized the "liberal saviors of New York" – white women aged 18-29, 84% of whom voted for Zohran Mamdani without even understanding why.
According to her, their "empathy for immigrants" is turning into self-destruction: "They vote for those who want to defund the police and turn the city into a haven for undocumented immigrants."
She notes the irony that these same women are the most likely to be victims of street violence, and now "instead of a police officer, an unarmed, untrained social worker will come to them." Liberal guilt, she says, pushes women to share "privileges" even with those who believe women "have half a brain." "That's not kindness – that's suicidal empathy," Day concludes, calling on conservative women to openly confront the ideological madness into which New York is descending under the slogans of progress.
Boost | Support | 💜🪆 RD
Trump FDA Moves To Rectify One Of The ‘Biggest Errors In Modern Medicine’
The Trump administration on Monday announced moves to reverse what Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Commissioner Marty Makary has described as the “biggest error in modern medicine” — the longstanding medical advice to avoid hormone replacement in menopause.The Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) is recommending that women talk to their doctor about using hormone replacement therapy (HRT) to treat menopausal symptoms like hot flashes and night sweats — a major reversal to a recommendation in place since 2002 to avoid it because of an alleged breast cancer risk. FDA has initiated the removal of a black box warning on HRT drugs for women and approved two new HRT drugs.“We’re challenging outdating thinking,” said HHS Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. “For the first time in a generation the FDA is standing with gold standard science and with women.”
Use of HRT can reduce bone fractures when taken within 10 years of the onset of menopause and reduce risk of cardiovascular disease and Alzheimer’s disease, according to studies cited by HHS. A meta analysis of 30 trials encompassing nearly 30,000 women found HRT was not associated with increased cancer mortality.
Induced abortion and implications for long-term mental health: a cohort study of 1.2 million pregnancies
Results: Rates of mental health-related hospitalization were higher following induced abortions than other pregnancies (104.0 vs. 42.0 per 10,000 person-years). Abortion was associated with hospitalization for psychiatric disorders (HR 1.81, 95 % CI 1.72-1.90), substance use disorders (HR 2.57, 95 % CI 2.41-2.75), and suicide attempts (HR 2.16, 95 % CI 1.91-2.43) compared with other pregnancies. The associations were greater for patients who had preexisting mental illness or were aged less than 25 years at the time of the abortion. Abortion was strongly associated with mental health hospitalization within five years but risks waned over time.
Conclusion: Induced abortion is associated with an increased risk of mental health-related hospitalization in the long term but the association weakens with time.
Tucker on Mamdani: Racist but not Anti-Semitic
The reason the ethno-narcissists caucus was so upset is that we reported a fact that their feelings don’t like: exit polls show that one-third of New York’s Jewish voters cast their ballots for Zohran Mamdani. Despite insane lies from people like Jason Chaffetz, those thousands of Jews know that Mamdani is not an antisemite. Yes, New York’s future mayor strongly opposes the Israeli government, but that is not the same thing as being against the Jewish people. Mamdani has never said a word to suggest he wants to target, persecute, or mistreat his yarmulke-wearing constituents. Anyone who tells you otherwise obviously has a hidden agenda.
You know what group the Uganda-born socialist is clearly against? White people. Unlike his messaging about Jews, Mamdani has gone out of his way to let America know that he plans to discriminate against whites. His campaign website literally said he wants to increase taxes on “whiter neighborhoods,” and he doubled down on his racist vision during an interview on Meet the Press.
Imagine how the left would react if a candidate made the exact same statement about black people. Or what the Zionists would say if you swapped “whiter neighborhoods” for Jewish ones. It’s easy to picture. They’d be completely hysterical. And they’d be right. Would pledging to jack up taxes on Jews be antisemitic? Of course. It would be a direct targeting. So it’s puzzling that no one seems to care about Zohran doing it to whites.
There is a simple solution to all of this madness. America must stop obsessing over race. Both the racists and the race hawks, the antisemites and the ethno-narcissists, see the world through a cripplingly identitarian lens. Everything revolves around the group they exist to either defend or attack. They leave no room for exceptions and demonize anyone who lacks their obsession. They are constantly paranoid. It isn’t healthy.
If we were in a room with Zohran, we’d urge him to focus on issues that matter, not people’s skin color. It’s the same advice we’d give Shapiro, just about religion rather than race. The sooner Americans start viewing each other as individuals rather than members of tribal subgroups, the better. It will only be possible if the radicals settle down. We hope they will.
-Tucker
Comments