top of page
Search
Dagny

Drones, AI, and the Strange Fall of Syria


Drones have been seen all over the world.

They have been called out by both Trump and the White House but they persist....


What do we know about them and what are reasonable conclusions?


These drones are not military (says the Pentagon).

The military is not allowed to shoot them down (says General Flynn and observation.)

They are not illegal (says the White House).

They are often not the kind of drones the general public can buy.

Some are very large or act very strangely.

Trump says to shoot them down if they remain unidentified.


The only reasonable conclusion is that they are Intelligence Agency owned and operated.

Thus they are the Deep State/CIA et al. controlled.

They have some impressive tech they have latched onto over the years including things we have never seen.


The nuclear material missing is a trivial risk and just a flimsy cover story.

These are seen all over the world and the amount of radioactive material missing is tiny.


They are obvious with lights and noise putting on a show.

They are often seen near military facilities.

These drones cannot take out a military facility.

But they can take out individuals.


Their goal? To intimidate key people all over the world.


Welcome to the real life plot of the movie Winter Soldier from the Avengers.

Plot: Intelligence operation Project Insight has three Helicarriers linked to spy satellites, designed to eliminate threats preemptively. AI identifies the threat and the targeted individuals are zapped from above.


A flying aircraft carrier is silly physics.

However the same job of world wide killing can be done by drones.

A world wide bunch of drones with lethality is a credible threat to individuals and their families in positions to make decisions for our military.


Will the military follow Trump or the Deep State?

This is one of the last cards the Deep State can play... Their advanced technology.


Is this credible? Consider Israel's AI targeting system called Lavender. This system takes in massive amounts of information from electronic devices (drones, cellphones, webcams, radio transmissions, televisions, texts, microphones, social media etc.) to identify and track target individuals. These targets are then designated for attack by drones, soldiers, missiles etc.



In Gaza as reported by the Guardian:


The machine did it coldly’: Israel used AI to identify 37,000 Hamas targets

The Israeli military’s bombing campaign in Gaza used a previously undisclosed AI-powered database that at one stage identified 37,000 potential targets based on their apparent links to Hamas, according to intelligence sources involved in the war.


In addition to talking about their use of the AI system, called Lavender, the intelligence sources claim that Israeli military officials permitted large numbers of Palestinian civilians to be killed, particularly during the early weeks and months of the conflict.


Another Lavender user questioned whether humans’ role in the selection process was meaningful. “I would invest 20 seconds for each target at this stage, and do dozens of them every day. I had zero added-value as a human, apart from being a stamp of approval. It saved a lot of time.”


“There were times when a Hamas operative was defined more broadly, and then the machine started bringing us all kinds of civil defence personnel, police officers, on whom it would be a shame to waste bombs. They help the Hamas government, but they don’t really endanger soldiers.”


According to +972 and Local Call, the IDF judged it permissible to kill more than 100 civilians in attacks on a top-ranking Hamas officials. “We had a calculation for how many [civilians could be killed] for the brigade commander, how many [civilians] for a battalion commander, and so on,” one source said.



Would Israel use it in other countries besides Gaza?

They already have. There are no national boundaries for Lavender. Not only has it been used in Gaza, but it appears to have been used in Lebanon and also Syria before its fall. Key people have been targeted by the IDF in Damascus. They have threatened to use targeting in Iran:


"🇮🇱🇮🇷A senior Israeli security official has threatened to assassinate Iran's Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei. The missile attack on Israel requires decisive action against Iran's leadership, including the elimination of Khamenei, a senior Israeli security official told the Jerusalem Post .

We need to go beyond military targets and strike at the heart of the regime.

He also called for strikes on targets related to the oil and gas sector, communications, banking system and nuclear programs to undermine Iran's economy."


Now consider the strange fall of Syria.


Soldiers hardened by decades of warfare suddenly laid down their arms and surrendered. Massive numbers of their own people were slaughtered. Soldiers fled to Iraq and could not fight. These are people who had stood up to Israeli incursions for many years. They included thousands of Russians, Iranians, and Syrian Army soldiers.


Why would they do that?

If you were a tough soldier, you would only do that if your superior told you to, or you had been drugged.


There is no current evidence of drug exposure. Furthermore, the Russians there did not show any signs of that. The Russians were disgusted by the surrender saying the Syrian soldiers had "thrown away their weapons, thrown away their balls".


If it was not drugs then it was their own officers standing down.


Were these officers targeted by Lavender? Could they have been threatened or bribed or both? Did they choose to stand down because they had been selected by Lavender for special treatment?


Did the ranking officers in the Syrian military have leverage on them, such as being informed that drones could easily kill their families?


Is Iran next? Netanyahu has publicly declared that Iran would be next and "sooner than most people think".


There are no national boundaries when it comes to the intelligence state aka the Deep State aka the "Blob".


What about America?


Would the same work in the US to keep military obedient to the Deep State rather than assist Trump in restoring the Rule of Law?


Suddenly we have drones in positions near military bases. We have no credible explanation for their being there except as a highly visible threat against individuals.


Could these military decision makers be covertly influenced by bribes or threats against them or their families?


Israeli urban battlefield assassin drones are an effective and serious threat..

Based on racing drones, the new LANIUS loitering munition could easily get into and attack in tight places, like tunnels and buildings.



When push comes to shove and Trump and his team start to dismantle the Deep State at some point the military may be involved. If given an order from Trump versus an order from an intelligence agency which one will they follow? Will those key military decision makers who follow Trump be eliminated?


Given this context, does this reasonably explain why the drones are here and why now?























57 views0 comments

Recent Posts

See All

Kommentare


bottom of page