4 August 2019 - Evening News
First the Non-Shooting News, which is Devastating to the Democrats, the Deep State FBI under Comey, and Hillary. Three very big things happened that were takeoff the public's awareness by the shootings:
Shocking but undeniable evidence became public that the FBI helped erase and Bleachbit Hillary’s computers and also hammered her phones as part of an agreement with Hillary:
It was reported late last week that the Obama FBI and DOJ worked with Hillary Clinton in the destruction of evidence pertinent to her case.
FBI agreed in the immunity contracts not to do a full investigation on the Clinton emails. To make matters worse, again, per the immunity agreements, the FBI agreed to destroy the computers that had the back-up emails.
In breaking news, the American Center for Law and Justice or ACLJ (Jay Sekulow’s organization, not related to his role as the President’s attorney), has obtained actual copies of the immunity agreements pertaining to Cheryl Mills and Heather Samuelson in the Hillary email scandal. This was a stunning litigation win, hard-fought after years of litigation by the ACLJ attorneys, who were unable to extract the documents through the normal FOIA processes, due to a lack of cooperation by the government.
In reviewing what the agreements uncovered, keep in mind that Cheryl Mills was Secretary Clinton’s Chief of Staff at the State Department and then bizarrely, she subsequently served as Clinton’s attorney, representing her in the email scandal. Heather Samuelson worked on Hillary Clinton’s 2008 campaign, and then became a Senior Advisor to her at the State Department, as well as the White House liaison. Somehow, she also became one of Clinton’s personal attorneys during the email scandal.
The immunity agreements issued by the government, were crafted so that the agencies could extract information from the parties, despite the fact that this is not necessary because DOJ has the power to require that the information be turned over. Clinton kept classified emails on a private server in violation of Federal law, and the immunity agreements reveal that both Cheryl Mills and Heather Samuelson were actively involved in the cover-up of these emails as well as in the destruction of evidence. According to Jordon Sekulow, Executive Director of the ACLJ, it is extremely unusual for someone involved in a criminal cover up, who needs an immunity deal to ensure the evasion of jail time, later becomes the attorney representing the other potential criminal or co-conspirator.
Subsequently, Mills and Samuelson finally gave the computers over to the FBI, which per their agreements, limited the FBI’s investigation. The FBI agreed to limit a) the method by which the emails investigated would be obtained; b) the scope of files which would be investigated, and c) the timeframe parameters for investigated emails. In other words, the FBI agreed in the immunity contracts not to do a full investigation on the Clinton emails. To make matters worse, again, per the immunity agreements, the FBI agreed to destroy the computers that had the back-up emails. As Congressman Jim Jordan referenced during the Mueller hearings recently, the FBI used bleachBit to purge the server so the information could never be accessed in the future and used hammers to smash the cell phones involved. In other words, the FBI and DOJ participated in the destruction of the evidence. In effect, this constitutes is a conspiracy between the Obama DOJ (under Loretta Lynch) and the Comey-led FBI to cover up Clinton’s crimes.
Additionally, the immunity agreements were broad in scope. There were numerous charges that the agreements gave them immunity from including potential violations of the Federal Records Act, the Classified Information Act and the Espionage Act. According to the ACLJ, nobody has ever gotten immunity from the Espionage Act before. Normally, immunity is for lesser crimes like obstruction of justice, but not espionage. If Mills and Samuelson were charged and convicted of every crime from which they received immunity, they would be potentially subject to twenty-eight years in jail each.
After Clinton illegally sent classified emails on a private server and cell phones (and by the way, people have gone to jail for this even when they did so accidentally because it's that serious), and after Mills and Samuelson purposely worked to cover up and conceal both the emails and the destruction of evidence, and after they were given a sweetheart deal that nobody in history has ever gotten, they became the attorneys for Clinton, representing her in the email case.
The DNC tried to sue Julian Assange and others for publishing the Wikileaks Hillary emails. The Clinton-appointed judge just threw out the case.
A federal judge in frank terms has dismissed a lawsuit by the Democratic National Committee (DNC) against key members of the Trump campaign and WikiLeaks over hacked DNC documents, saying they "did not participate in any wrongdoing in obtaining the materials in the first place" and therefore bore no legal liability for disseminating the information.
The ruling came as Democrats have increasingly sought to tie the Trump team to illegal activity in Russia, in spite of Special Counsel Robert Mueller's findings that the campaign in fact refused multiple offers by Russians to involve them in hacking and disinformation efforts.
Judge John Koeltl, a Bill Clinton appointee sitting in the Southern District of New York, wrote in his 81-page opinion Tuesday that the DNC's argument was "entirely divorced" from the facts.
"In short, the DNC raises a number of connections and communications between the defendants and with people loosely connected to the Russian Federation, but at no point does the DNC allege any facts ... to show that any of the defendants -- other than the Russian Federation -- participated in the theft of the DNC's information," Koeltl said.
"Nor does the DNC allege that the defendants ever agreed to help the Russian Federation steal the DNC's documents," he added.
But even if the Russians had directly provided the hacked documents to the Trump team, the judge wrote, it would not be criminal for the campaign to then publish those documents, as long as they did not contribute to the hacking itself.
In addition to the Trump campaign, WikiLeaks, and Russia, the DNC's suit named Donald Trump Jr., Paul Manafort, Jared Kushner, George Papadopoulos, Richard Gates (whose connections with Russia were "threadbare," the judge said), Roger Stone, Joseph Mifsud, and Julian Assange.
Dismissing Case This Week because WikiLeaks is Protected Under Freedom of Speech!
Judge’s ruling throws huge spanner into US extradition proceedings against Assange
A US judge has ruled that WikiLeaks was fully entitled to publish the Democratic National Congress (DNC) emails, which means no law was broken. The ruling is highly significant as it could impact upon the US extradition proceedings against WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange,
Greg Barns, a barrister and longtime adviser to the Assange campaign, told The Canary:
The Court, in dismissing the case, found that the First Amendment protected WikiLeaks’ right to publish, illegally secured, private or classified documents of public interest, applying the same First Amendment standard as was used in justifying the The New York Times publication of the Pentagon Papers. That right exists, so long as a publisher does not join in any illegal acts that the source may have committed to obtain that information. But that doesn’t include common journalistic practices, such as requesting or soliciting documents or actively collaborating with a source. So this case is important in restating what is and is not protected under the First Amendment.
But does it have implications for the extradition hearing? Well it certainly helps to remind the courts in the UK that the First Amendment protection is very broad.
Tulsi Gabbard also recently exposed Kama Harris’s abuse of power as Attorney General for California…
Kamala Harris responded by essentially calling Tulsi a “Russian Operative”. If they don’t lie whatever theiy are hearing, then it’s Russia Russia Russia - even with fellow Democrats.
Kamala Harris Campaign Blames Russia for Humiliation by Tulsi Gabbard
Sen. Kamala Harris (D-CA)’s campaign press secretary suggested Russia was behind Rep. Tulsi Gabbard (D-HI) after she landed an effective blow on Harris’ record as a prosecutor during the Democrat debates on Wednesday night.
Her press secretary, Ian Sams, tweeted shortly after the attack an NBC News article from February 2019 claiming the “Russian propaganda machine” was promoting Gabbard:
“Reporters writing their stories with eyes on the modern-day assignment desk of Twitter, read this: ‘The Russian propaganda machine that tried to influence the 2016 election is now promoting the presidential aspirations of a controversial Hawaii Democrat,'” he tweeted. He later retweeted his tweet.
The NBC News article from February 2019 cites, “several experts who track websites and social media linked to the Kremlin” who have seen “what they believe may be the first stirrings of an upcoming Russian campaign of support for Gabbard.” Among the experts are analysts from New Knowledge, which ran a Russian-like disinformation campaign against Republican Alabama Senate candidate Roy Moore.
(Excerpt) Read more at breitbart.com ...https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2019/08/01/kamala-harris-campaign-claims-russians-are-behind-tulsi-gabbard-after-hawaii-democrat-lands-attack/
On August 1st a document was put out by the FBI Field office in Phoenix Arizona saying that those who believe Qanon/Q are potential domestic terrorists.
This is a media/FBI strategy to discredit Q et al because people are getting to believe the nefarious dealings of the Deep State given the public exposure of Epstein. A link to the original FBI statement is midway through the article so you can see for yourself:
It was from the Phoenix Field Office - and not exactly from the HQ of the FBI.
“The FBI assesses these conspiracy theories very likely will emerge, spread, and evolve in the modern information marketplace, occasionally driving both groups and individual extremists to carry out criminal or violent acts,” the document states. It also goes on to say the FBI believes conspiracy theory-driven extremists are likely to increase during the 2020 presidential election cycle.
In May, Michael C. McGarrity, the FBI’s assistant director of the counterterrorism division, told Congress the bureau now “classifies domestic terrorism threats into four main categories: racially motivated violent extremism, anti-government/anti-authority extremism, animal rights/environmental extremism, and abortion extremism,” a term the bureau uses to classify both pro-choice and anti-abortion extremists.
(Note: Doesn't Antifa fit under the above definitions?)
When asked to confirm the document’s authenticity, neither the FBI nor the DHS would comment as noted by Yahoo. One person claiming to be a retired police chief in Las Vegas on Twitter wrote that he had seen the original FBI document and that it did not mention Qanon or Q, and that it therefore had been doctored by either Yahoo or its source. He further said that the FBI prohibits releasing the document to the public so he couldn’t do that - which raises the question how Yahoo got a copy.
A obvious and glaring omission is that Antifa fits their definition of domestic terrorism but is nowhere mentioned in the Yahoo provided document.
When polite inquiries were made, the author of the Yahoo article refused to answer any questions - including how she acquired the article. Normally a source for an official document is given.
There is getting to be quite a list of shooters - all of which were leftists who did it because, in their own words online, they were supporting various parts of the Democrat Leftist Party Line.
In New Zealand it was environmentalism (https://www.europeanfreedom.com/2019/03/16/the-great-replacement-the-manifesto-of-brenton-tarrant-the-new-zealand-mosque-shooter/).
In Gilroy it was also environmentalism.
In El Paso it was guaranteed income and universal health care.
In Dayton it was socialism.
They all were anti-immigrant at the same time as being for Democrat causes.
Shortly after the FBI document was published the shooter launched his attack in the El Paso Walmart. The shooter is Patrick Crusius, who bears a remarkable similarity to the Gilroy Garlic Festival shooter Santino Legan:
MyLife gathers personal information through public records and other sources to automatically generate a “MyLife Public Page” for each person, described by MyLife as a “complete Wikipedia-like biography on every American.”
His original MyLife profile at 2:46 said he was a registered Democrat.
At 2:50 PM leftists changed his political affiliation from Democrat to Republican. At 2:52 his profile was changed again. Later his description said he is a Republican and QAnon member.
It is clear from the El Paso Shooter's words that he is a PROGRESSIVE white nationalist – what was once defined as a “Nazi.” All you have to do is read his manifesto to see the obvious tell-tale signs.
Under his section titled “Economic Reasons” for the attack, the shooter states:
“In the near future, America will have to initiate a basic universal income to prevent widespread poverty and civil unrest as people lose their jobs (to automation). Joblessness is in itself a source of civil unrest. The less dependents on a government welfare system, the lower the unemployment rate, the better. Achieving ambitious social projects like universal healthcare and UBI would become far more likely to succeed if tens of millions of defendants are removed.”
His was an act of anti-capitalist terrorism as well:
“The decimation of our environment is creating a massive burden for future generations. Corporations are heading the destruction of our environment by shamelessly overharvesting resources.”
Not exactly sounding like a Republican, but this next quote does remind me of one of the parties:
“I am against race mixing because it destroys genetic diversity and creates identity problems….But the idea of deporting or murdering all non-white Americans is horrific. Many have been here as long as the whites, and have done as much to build our country. The best solution to this for now would be to divide America int a confederacy of territories with at least 1 territory for each race.”
That sounds a lot like the Germans in WW2 and the KKK.
"The father of the El Paso shooter is Bryan Crusius. And big surprise, he’s a therapist. Most people seem to be focusing on his more recent work as a weird new age yogi. However, I’m more interested in his former role: Director of Dual Diagnosis at a psychiatric hospital."
The question of drugs comes up as a possible issue in the shooting because Patrick Crusius’s father is a therapist who was (in his own words) a drug addict for 40 years, and who was a Director of Dual Diagnosis at a psychiatric hospital called Timberlawn. It was shut down by the government last year:
“children and adults trying to recover from trauma, depression or other mental conditions have gone to the hospital in East Dallas for help -- and found danger instead.”
The father is also a “Mobile crisis therapist”. https://twitter.com/JuliansRum/status/1157815842723258373
He was into "new age" interventions with crystals and crystal bowls that provide “sound therapy”.
"Crusius now works as a licensed therapist and "energy and sound medicine practitioner" in Allen, Texas. In his book, he writes that he suffered from health problems that left an impact on his four children — Austin, his son with ex-wife Kathleen; and Patrick, Emily and Blake, from his marriage to second wife Lori."
From Wikipedia: The practitioner places crystals on different parts of the body, often corresponding to chakras; or else the practitioner places crystals around the body in an attempt to construct an energy grid, which is purported to surround the client with healing energy.
Strangely, a CNN producer was following the shooter before the shooting. How very prescient of CNN. The shooter Patrick Crucius had only a few followers.
Remember how CNN just happened to be waiting across the street when Roger Stone’s home was raided in an early morning SWAT? Well one of the producers of CNN (Paul Murphy) was following the El Paso Shooter before the shooting. It certainly implies an incestuous relationship between CNN and the FBI, and implies some prior knowledge of the El Paso shooting...
Perhaps a coincidence, but David Hogg or Parkfield Shooting Fame was in west Texas only 6 days before the El Paso shooting. He posted this on his instagram 6 days before the El Paso shooting. Remember how the students from Parkfield were also at the New Zealand shooting location a short time before the shooting there occurred.
The Gilroy shooter condemned immigrants for environmental reasons: paving over California to make housing for more immigrants. The El Paso shooter condemned immigrants for preventing universal income and universal health care. The New Zealand shooter also killed immigrants for ecological reasons. The El Paso shooter cited the New Zealand shooter’s manifesto in his manifesto.
These are things the Democrats were pushing and it fits with his calling himself a Democrat (before the changes at MyLife from Democrat to Republican and Qanon after he was arrested.).
In fact it fits nicely with the German National Socialists (NAZI) calling for Democrat/Socialist programs and benefits, while attacking select races/immigrants.
Then hours later there was another shooting in a bar in Dayton Ohio:
[Dayton Shooter] Connor Betts: Twitter Posts on Being a Leftist, Guns
Connor Betts, the Dayton, Ohio mass shooter, was a self-described “leftist,” who wrote that he would happily vote for Democrat Elizabeth Warren, praised Satan, was upset about the 2016 presidential election results, and added, “I want socialism, and i’ll not wait for the idiots to finally come round to understanding.”
Betts’ Twitter profile read, “he/him / anime fan / metalhead / leftist / i’m going to hell and i’m not coming back.” One tweet on his page read, “Off to Midnight Mass. At least the songs are good. #athiestsonchristmas.” The page handle? I am the spookster. On one selfie, he included the hashtags, “#selfie4satan #HailSatan @SatanTweeting.” On the date of Republican Sen. John McCain’s death, he wrote, “F*ck John McCain.”
On Nov. 2, 2018, he wrote: “Vote blue for gods sake.”
(Excerpt) Read more at heavy.com ...
The shooter Connor Betts was pictured with satanic patches on his jacket in a previous photo — via Robby Starbuck.
The patches he’s wearing are from a known satanist apparel company. One of them reads “against all gods". This is a culture problem. A godless culture of death with no respect for life. https://t.co/IsOSdFHSqy
— Robby Starbuck (@robbystarbuck) August 4, 2019The patch “against all gods” is a blackcraft cult product.
Connor Betts was not a Trump fan.
This is what he tweeted on election night 2016.
BREAKING: The Dayton terrorist was a self-described "leftist" and Antifa supporter – The Post Millennial https://t.co/vyTSor6Wy4
— Jack Posobiec 🇺🇸 (@JackPosobiec) August 5, 2019
He retweeted antifa accounts.
The suspect retweeted Antifa accounts pic.twitter.com/pJH1mkR00F
— Ryan Saavedra (@RealSaavedra) August 5, 2019
Ohio gunman described himself as pro-Satan 'leftist' who supported Elizabeth Warrenhttps://t.co/KgnDW9aTbkpic.twitter.com/Bmbm04AAzA
— The Washington Times (@WashTimes) August 4, 2019
The man who died after allegedly murdering 9 in Dayton, Ohio is a registered Democrat who voted in two Democratic Primaries. Big League Politics can report that Connor S. Betts, the alleged mass shooter who killed at least 9 people in an entertainment district of Dayton, Ohio earlier today was a registered Democrat who has voted in 7 previous elections, including two Democratic Primaries. Betts was killed during the altercation with police.
Some of the coincidences might paint picture of culpability of the FBI:
How did the CNN producer know to follow the El Paso shooter before the shooting? Who would have known and tipped him off? It is an inexplicable as the CNN crew waiting across the street when Roger Stone was raided. Why was the Anti-gun Hogg, present at the Parkland shooting and son of an FBI agent, in West Texas shortly before the shooting in El Paso? Wasn’t it convenient to have this happen just as very incriminating and indisputable evidence against the FBI came out (that they agreed in writing to destroy evidence on behalf of Hillary).
Here is the opinion of Natural News:
"These two shootings were initiated in the hours following the bombshell revelation that the FBI conspired with Hillary Clinton and the Obama administration to destroy Clinton’s email hard drives as a means to eliminate any evidence of Hillary Clinton’s prosecutable crimes.
Former FBI director James Comey is now known to have run multiple criminal schemes to illegally frame Trump administration officials while clearing Obama-era officials as part of a treasonous deep state plot to overthrow the United States of America, defeat President Trump and frame Trump supporters as domestic terrorists."
Meanwhile, the front runner (according to the polls) for the Democrat nomination for President:
"Biden, 76, mistakenly referred to the shootings as “the tragic events in Houston today and also in Michigan the day before," but later corrected himself, according to a pool report. Biden seemingly confused Houston for El Paso and Michigan for Ohio when speaking to donors about the shootings."