top of page
  • Dagny

15 May 2020 - Deep State Exposed

Updated: May 15, 2020

The Impeachment and the whole Russia Russia Russia hoax was based on a phone call between General Flynn and a Russian ambassador. As part of the transition team General Flynn was supposed to talk with the Russian, but that didn't stop the Deep State minions from pretending it was a big national security problem, and that Trump was working for the Russians.

Not only was that narrative utterly destroyed this week - it also became clear that it was a plot hatched by now named people in the Obama Administration. They were caught red handed.

Acting Director of National Intelligence Grenell tears the Classified Cloak away from the Deep State:

Trump Tweets and Re-tweets: OBAMAGATE! If I were a Senator or Congressman, the first person I would call to testify about the biggest political crime and scandal in the history of the USA, by FAR, is former President Obama. He knew EVERYTHING. Do it @LindseyGrahamSC, just do it. No more Mr. Nice Guy. No more talk!

Rep. Nunes Promises “Criminal Referrals” to Gregg Jarrett in Fox Nation Special

Where is the 302? It is missing. Was it stolen or destroyed? General Flynn is being persecuted! #OBAMAGATE "Obamagate is not a conspiracy theory. “Newly released documents show Schiff knew all along there was no proof of Russia-Trump collusion.” Wall Street Journal Obama, Biden, CIA director Brennan, intelligence chief Clapper, attorney general Holder - ALL OF THEM used law enforcement against political rivals This is the behavior of a police state. Sen. Rand Paul: "Biden accessed the identity and the private conversation of a political opponent. There is no more clear violation of a politician using their office and abusing their office to go after a political opponent -- and I think he's caught red-handed here."

Acting Director of National Intelligence Richard Grenell finally tore away the cloak of “classified” secrecy the Deep State has been hiding behind. Revealing: There was a conspiracy to frame General Flynn hatched at the highest levels in the Obama Administration. Some of these co-conspirators even requested the unmasking BEFORE the event they were unmasking even happened. They had foreknowledge. They set it up. Adam Schiff and his associates have been knowingly and brazenly lying to the American people from the start. They always knew there was nothing to the rumor that Trump was dealing with the Russians. From the declassified transcripts we know Podesta testified under oath that the salacious Steele dossier was half paid for by the DNC and half paid for by the Clinton Campaign. Joe Biden was involved. People controlling vast amounts of federal money (Treasury department) were involved. People in the administration dealing with other nations were involved. There were many people in the conspiracy which explains why it is taking so long to get justice - they are protecting each other and sabotaging Trump at every opportunity. There was no peaceful transition of power. Rand Paul says “Vice President Biden is guilty of using government to go after a political opponent.” "Newly released documents show Schiff knew all along there was no proof of Russia-Trump collusion." Wall Street Journal Here is the list of co-conspirators below : Richard Grenell notification to congress declassified “unmasking list” Flynn between late 2016 and January 2017 CBS News ^ SCOOP @CBSNews obtains @RichardGrenell notification to congress declassified “unmasking list” Flynn between late 2016 and January 2017

Also: What were all those Treasury Department people on the list for? Why would they have any interest in General Flynn's talking to a Russian? None. What was their role in the conspiracy? Moving money around perhaps? Payoffs?

Van Grack - lead prosecutor in Flynn matter withdraws himself for the case and all DOJ cases  NEW: Brandon Van Grack who heads up the Justice Department's FARA unit, worked with Special Counsel Robert Mueller, and was a prosecutor in the case against Michael Flynn has told the court he is withdrawing from the Flynn case.  He stated no reason for the withdrawal. Close to 2000 corrupt DOJ and thus in on the scam officials try in vain to get Atty General Barr to quit.

Nearly 2000 Justice Dept. officials have signed onto a letter calling for Attorney General William Barr to resign over what they describe as his improper intervention in the criminal case of former Trump national security adviser Michael Flynn. Sydney Powell, Flynn’s lawyer:

Excellent. Now we know names of more than 2000 political operatives masquerading as lawyers but who have no regard for the Rule of Law. Guess they forgot @EricHolder dismissed Stevens' case for like reasons & Judge Sullivan granted. Read the book! @POTUS (Dagny: How convenient! They supplied their own hit list! Fire away!) Trump Tweets: Yesterday was a BIG day for Justice in the USA. Congratulations to General Flynn, and many others. I do believe there is MUCH more to come! Dirty Cops and Crooked Politicians do not go well together! Trump also retweeted:

Evidence has surfaced that indicates Barack Obama was the one running the Russian hoax. Adam Schiff hides important transcripts from the American people. A storm is coming…

And more...

Acting Director of National Intelligence Richard Grenell has declassified information calling into question the conclusion that Russia interfered in the 2016 election to help Donald Trump. Henry told Tucker Carlson on Tucker Carlson Tonight that the new information would suggest that John Brennan, who headed the Central Intelligence Agency under President Barack Obama, “also had intel saying, actually, Russia wanted Hillary Clinton to win because she was a known quantity, she had been secretary of state, and Vladimir Putin’s team thought she was more malleable, while candidate Donald Trump was unpredictable.” It was all a lie made in a conspiracy to prevent the duly elected president of the United States from being able to have the powers due any president. It was a hostile takeover of the Fedreal Justice System for years so they could go on looting the system with impunity. Newt Gingrich Says: newtgingrich@newtgingrich "Why aren’t the reporters and commentators furious now that they have proof that Adam Schiff has lied to them for the last three years? You would think simple pride in their profession would make them want to investigate and expose the biggest liar on Capitol Hill." Senator Rand Paul@RandPaul Says:

"Declassified documents reveal V.P. Biden ordered the unmasking of General Flynn’s private conversation. Anyone think that Biden might have abused his power to go after a political opponent…"

"The Senate must immediately hold hearings on this! Clapper, Comey, Brennan and even Biden owe it to the American people. They should testify under oath. What did the former president know?" Sen. Rand Paul (R-KY) announced Wednesday he will invite acting Director of National Intelligence Richard Grenell to testify before a Senate hearing next week on the newly declassified list of Obama officials who requested the unmasking of Lt. Gen. Michael Flynn (U.S. Army ret.) in late 2016 and early 2017 when Flynn as acting as President-Elect Donald Trump’s national security advisor. The list includes the highest levels of the administration including Obama Chief of Staff Denis McDonough and Vice President Joe Biden. Yesterday I wrote to DNI @RichardGrenellrequesting the names of those who were involved in Gen Flynn’s unmasking. Today I received the shocking reply that @JoeBiden and many others knew! What did President Obama know? I am inviting DNI Grenell to testify next week in the Senate — Senator Rand Paul (@RandPaul) May 13, 2020 Paul is chairman of the Senate Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs: Subcommittee on Federal Spending Oversight and Emergency Management. The Wall Street Journal Lays it Out: Newly released Congressional testimony shows that Adam Schiff spread falsehoods shamelessly about Russia and Donald Trump for three years even as his own committee gathered contrary evidence.”That’s how the Wall Street Journal editorial board sees it. The WSJ combed through 57 transcripts of interviews released last week by the House Intelligence Committee, all involving the so-called Reussian meddling in the 2016 presidential election. The committee, now headed by Schiff, began its probe in January 2017 and ended it in March 2018 — with a final finding that there was no evidence the Trump campaign conspired with Russia. Schiff refused to release the transcripts after he became chairman in 2019.

Now we know why,” the WSJ ed board said.

From the earliest days of the collusion narrative, Mr. Schiff insisted that he had evidence proving the plot. In March 2017 on MSNBC, Mr. Schiff teased that he couldn’t “go into particulars, but there is more than circumstantial evidence now.”

In December 2017 he told CNN that collusion was a fact: “The Russians offered help, the campaign accepted help. The Russians gave help and the President made full use of that help.” In April 2018, Mr. Schiff released his response to Mr. Nunes’s report, stating that its finding of no collusion “was unsupported by the facts and the investigative record.

But all of Schiff’s claims were lies.

None of this was true, and Mr. Schiff knew it.,” the ed board wrote. “In July 2017, here’s what former Director of National Intelligence James Clapper told Mr. Schiff and his colleagues: ‘I never saw any direct empirical evidence that the Trump campaign or someone in it was plotting/conspiring with the Russians to meddle with the election.’ Three months later, former Obama Attorney General Loretta Lynch agreed that while she’d seen “concerning” information, ‘I don’t recall anything being briefed up to me.’ Former Deputy AG Sally Yates concurred several weeks later: ‘We were at the fact-gathering stage here, not the conclusion stage.’

The piece concludes: “As for Mr. Schiff, no one should ever believe another word he says.” Here’s a laugh: Former President Barack Obama, talking "privately" to ex-members of his administration, said Friday that the “rule of law is at risk” Perhaps he meant “My rule of law is at stake." Obama’s Wingman Eric Holder Goes on MSNBC to Trash AG Bill Barr — After his Law Firm Illegally Withheld 6,800 Documents from Gen. Flynn (VIDEO) Can you prosecute without prosecutors? No. AG Barr dropped the charges of course now that the public knows the whole thing was a sham and an attempt to frame Flynn. You would think that was the end of the case against Flynn? Nope.

Truly bizarre: The Obama appointed African American Judge over Flynn’s case won’t take no for an answer. He’s now calling in Flynn’s fired attorneys (who were corrupt), and a retired Clinton appointed judge to act as prosecutors, since the DOJ dropped the charges.This judge is not just a judge - he’s essentially hiring new prosecution when the case didn’t go his way!!

This sorry excuse for a judge (indeed sorry excuse for a human being) refused to close the case. Instead he called in enemies of Flynn as friends of the court to argue for new charges against Flynn. What is even more outrageous is that the judge’s action was in direct contradiction of a Supreme Court ruling regarding friends of the court one week ago. Even Ruth Bader Ginsberg wrote the decision! The political operative judge cannot win - only delay... "After the Justice Department moved to drop the case against former National Security Adviser Michael Flynn last week, the judge in the case signaled in a filing that he will allow outside parties to file "amicus" filings, also known as "friend-of-the-court" filings, which allow a non-party to a case to weigh in.What makes it bizarre is that the Judge, Emmet Sullivan, denied this type of third party intervention 24 times during the case- yet has suddenly changed his mind after an activist group which calls itself the "Watergate Prosecutors" moved to file an amicus brief, according to the Washington Examiner. Flynn's lawyer, former federal prosecutor Sidney Powell, filed a six-page motion Tuesday evening slamming the decision, writing: "This Court has consistently — on 24 previous occasionssummarily refused to permit any third party to inject themselves or their views into this case," adding "the proposed amicus brief has no place in this court.”

"No rule allows the filing, and the self-proclaimed collection of ‘Watergate Prosecutors’ has no cognizable special interest," the filing continues. "Separation of powers forecloses their appearance here. Only the Department of Justice and the defense can be heard."

Powell told the Washington Examiner that the judge had denied all previous third-party interventions "until DOJ moves to dismiss and begins to expose the wrongdoing of the Obama administration.” "Supreme Court Ruled Unanimously Last Week Against Improper Use of Amicus Briefs; Relevant for Flynn Case" Federal Judge Emmet Sullivan ordered Flynn’s former legal team to reappear as an interested party and they complied by filing a notice of appearance.

Covington had numerous conflicts of interest related to their biggest case ever, representing General Michael Flynn in his unjust indictment by the Mueller gang.

Flynn’s attorneys at the firm withheld evidence from their client. They asked for dirt on President Trump. They hired individuals that were involved in the criminal Spygate scandal. After spending millions of dollars in legal fees, and after untold negative stories in the fake news media, General Flynn obtained new lawyers.

Flynn’s new lead counsel Sidney Powell fought to get her hands on the thousands of documents Covington & Burling were hiding from Flynn and the Court.

The hidden Brady material was finally released and General Flynn’s case was dropped by the DOJ after handwritten notes revealed the FBI framed Flynn.

In addition to this madness, Judge Sullivan appointed retired Clinton appointee judge John Gleeson to argue against the government’s motion to dismiss the charge against Flynn! Judge Sullivan Disregards Two Controlling Precedents By Appointing Amicus In Flynn Case Forbes ^| 5/14/2020 | Mark Chenoweth  U.S. District Court Judge Emmet Sullivan disregarded two controlling precedents from higher courts with his decision to appoint John Gleeson as amicus curiae in the U.S. v. Michael Flynn case this week. Judicial conduct similar to J. Sullivan’s in these prior, far less politically charged cases was roundly and unanimously condemned by Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg.  ...  One week ago, the U.S. Supreme Court issued a 9-0 decision, authored by Justice Ginsburg, that took judges to task for similar amicus antics. Her opinion for the Court in U.S. v. Sineneng-Smith upbraided the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit for violating a basic aspect of legal proceedings called the “party presentation principle.” In a nutshell, this concept dictates that judges must decide the case as presented by the parties before them. They are not to go out questing for dragons to slay (or issues to tackle) that the parties have not brought before them.

As J. Ginsburg put it: “[C]ourts are essentially passive instruments of government … They ‘do not, or should not, sally forth each day looking for wrongs to right. [They] wait for cases to come to [them], and when [cases arise, courts] normally decide only questions presented by the parties.” (Excerpt) Read more at As if that weren’t enough - that judge is even doing more: The judge overseeing the General Flynn case, Judge Sullivan, has shown his disdain for the rule of law. He accused General Flynn of treason during one court hearing. He is clearly a Deep State hack. Now he wants to bring another judge (Gleason) into the case to determine if it is right for the DOJ to dismiss the case against Flynn.

The problem for Judge Sullivan is that the judge he invited into his kangaroo court has said previously that what Judge Sullivan is doing is lawless.

In a July 1, 2013, memo and order in the case of U.S. v. HSBC, then-U.S. District Court Judge Gleeson seemed to side with the idea that prosecutors have “near-absolute power” to drop a case.

“The government has absolute discretion to decide not to prosecute,”Gleeson wrote at the time. “Even a formal, written agreement to that effect, which is often referred to as a ‘non-prosecution agreement,’ is not the business of the courts.”

Trump is telling it like it is: Trump says Obama, Biden are behind the Flynn unmasking. 49 seconds

Even more:

Muslim CIA Director for Obama Brennan was on the list of co-conspirators! Remember the lie that the Russians wanted Trump? It was a total fabrication that the media peddled to the masses:

Brennan perjured himself and suppressed intel saying Russia wanted Hillary Clinton to win the 2016 election. Brennan suppressed the intel that suggested Russia wanted Hillary to win and ran with narrative that all 17 intel agencies concluded Russia wanted Trump to become president.

John Brennan claimed in a May 2017 testimony under oath that Hillary’s phony dossier didn’tfactor into the Intelligence Community’s Assessment report on Russian interference of the 2016 presidential election.

Brennan told Trey Gowdy during his testimony when asked if the CIA relied on the dossier, “No. Because we — we didn’t. It wasn’t part of the corpus of intelligence information that we had. It was not in any way used as a basis for the Intelligence Community assessment that was done. It was — it was not.”

On page 179 of the IG report, Comey told IG investigators that he remembered having numerous discussions with John Brennan where the former CIA Director said the dossier was “important” enough to include in the ICA — Comey confirmed that yes, the dossier was part of the “corpus of intelligence information” the agency had. Samantha Power Claimed She Never Tried To Unmask Michael Flynn, But Records Show She Unmasked Him 7 Times. Perjury !

Meanwhile Democrat Politicians go wild with power and moving the goal posts to prolong their power:

Mayor Eric Garcetti said Wednesday during an appearance on ABC’s “Good Morning America” that Los Angeles won’t completely reopen until there is a cure for Coronavirus.There are 4 million people living in the city of Los Angeles and upwards of 10 million people living in Los Angeles County. On Tuesday it was reported Los Angeles County will likely extend its Coronavirus house arrest through until August.“We’ve never been fully closed, we’ll never be completely open until we have a cure,” Garcetti said. Washington State Governor Inslee goes for arresting people if they do not stay home:

During his press conference the Democrat Governor warned citizens that those families with an infection will not be allowed outside of their homes. Someone else will have to do their shopping for them. For those businesses/individuals that don’t comply, the governor stated that he confirmed with Attorney General Bob Ferguson, there will be sanctions in civil or crimal court.

At timestamp 38:55 in the video of the press conference below, one reporter asked: “When it comes to contact tracing, how are you guys going to handle people or families who want to refuse to test or to self isolate? If they want to leave their home to get groceries I know you’ve said they can’t do that; how will you make sure they don’t?“

Below is Jay Inslee’s response:

Therefore, those individuals that refuse to cooperate with contact tracers and/or refuse testing, those individuals will not be allowed to leave their homes to purchase basic necessities such as groceries and/or prescriptions. According to Governor Inslee those persons will need to make arrangements through friends, family, or a state provided “family support personnel.

See what they do when they think the cameras are off: 6 seconds

Explain to me why the media takes their masks off when they think the cameras are off? Is it all for show? #fakenews #LamestreamMedia looks like the rules only apply to us peasants. #obamagate #qanon

124 views0 comments


bottom of page