The Fall of Fauci
Updated: 5 days ago
Twitter Suspends Organization for Announcing They Will Release More Fauci Emails
Michelle Malkin: My friends at @ICANdecide [Informed Consent Action Network] were suspended by Twitter today for reporting that they have 3,000 additional pages of Fauci's emails they obtained thru FOIA! They'll be posting at http://icandecide.org tonight. Spread the word & help crowdsource review of the emails!
WHO arrives at the Wuhan Institute of Virology:
EcoHealth Alliance President Peter Daszak – who collaborated with the Wuhan Institute of Virology on research funded by Dr. Anthony Fauci’s National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Disease – appears to boast about the manipulation of “killer” SARS-like coronaviruses carried out by his “colleagues in China” in a clip unearthed by The National Pulse.
Daszak made the admission at a 2016 forum discussing “emerging infectious diseases and the next pandemic,” which appears to be at odds with Fauci’s repeated denial of funding gain-of-function research at the Wuhan Institute of Virology.
Dr. Peter Daszak, Heavily Involved in the COVID Crisis and Only American on WHO Investigation, Now Picked to Lead Lancet’s COVID Investigation
Here is the link to a Tucker Carlson segment on Fauci's emails. He does a very good job explaining a lot of the evidence that came out recently.
At the 6:30 mark Tucker points out that a email from Peter Daszak was redacted under code B7A. Peter Daszak was the person taking the money at ECOHealth Alliance to do the "gain of function" research at Wuhan. Explanation of code B7A is found here:
It says: "Exemption 7(A), authorizes the withholding of "records or information compiled for law enforcement purposes, but only to the extent that production of such law enforcement records or information . . . could reasonably be expected to interfere with enforcement proceedings."
Here is the email Tucker was talking about, a large portion of the body of the email is redacted with code B7A.
Essentially, there IS a criminal case being conducted right now. This is why Fauci was brought back to capital hill to testify once again very recently. Fauci perjured himself by claiming there was no "gain of function" research being conducted at Wuhan.
The Pentagon gave $39 million to a charity that funded controversial coronavirus research at a Chinese lab accused of being the source for Covid-19.
The charity’s chief, British-born scientist Dr. Peter Daszak, was exposed in an alleged conflict of interest and back-room campaign to discredit lab leak theories.
Federal data seen by DailyMail.com reveals The Pentagon gave $39 million to EcoHealth Alliance, which funded a lab in Wuhan, China, between 2013 and 2020
The Wuhan Institute of Virology is accused of being the source of Covid-19
The majority of the DoD funding came from the DTRA, a military branch with a mission to 'counter and deter weapons of mass destruction and improvised threat networks'
Federal grant data assembled by independent researchers shows that the charity has received more than $123 million from the government in total
Grants from the Pentagon included $6,491,025 from the Defense Threat Reduction Agency (DTRA) from 2017 to 2020
EHA also received $64.7 million from the US Agency for International Development (USAID)
It received $13 million from Health and Human Services, which includes the National Institutes of Health and Centers for Disease Control
It is not known how much of the money actually went to the Wuhan lab
EHA has also funded deeply controversial 'gain of function' experiments, where dangerous viruses are made more infectious to study their effect on human cells
HCQ Vindicated - best dosages now known:
New study reveals success of hydroxychloroquine as COVID treatment. It turns out the that the cumulative dose as a % of patient weight is key to the efficacy of the HCQ/AZT protocol.
"Thus, patients receiving HCQ above 80 mg/kg of HCQ with >1g AZM had 14 times higher survival odds compared to those who did not. If HCQ dosage was fixed at >3g, the odds of survival were 7 times higher, or less than half of that achieved with the weight-adjusted cumulative dosage."
Here is the study:
Repurposed drug Suramin 20x more potent that the nearly worthless and overpriced Remdesivir.
A new study published on the preprint server bioRxiv* reports the elucidation of the mechanism of inhibition of SARS-CoV-2 by a non-nucleotide inhibitor called suramin. This is the first such compound to be shown to have such activity and shows promise for use as a repurposed drug against COVID-19.
Compared to the earlier highly pathogenic SARS-CoV and MERS-CoV, severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) has much greater transmissibility and has therefore caused a pandemic rather than a local outbreak. Suramin is a drug that has been used to treat African sleeping sickness and river blindness for over a hundred years. Suramin has also been shown to be an inhibitor against a wide variety of viruses, including Zika and Chikungunya viruses, indicating its diverse mechanisms of action against multiple viruses.
For instance, it can prevent viral attachment, entry, and release from host cells by its interactions with viral capsid proteins. Recent research has shown it to be an in vitro inhibitor of SARS-CoV-2 infection in cell culture by preventing viral entry. The current study shows this to be due to its potent inhibition of SARS-CoV-2 RNA-dependent RNA polymerase (RdRp), an essential viral lifecycle enzyme. Suramin is 20 or more times as powerful as Remdesivir.
“Here is the trail of science and data that shows the derivative relationship between pine needles and Suramin (“the elist’s antidote” to microbial illnesses) – and which also provides a potential antidote for those affected by the spike protein contagion … Suramin further decreases the activities of a large number of enzymes involved in DNA and RNA synthesis and modification: DNA polymerases (103, 104), RNA polymerases (103, 105, 106), reverse transcriptase (18, 103), telomerase (67), and enzymes involved in winding/ unwinding of DNA (107, 108) are inhibited by suramin, as well as histone- and chromatin-modifying enzymes like chromobox proteins (109), methyltransferases (110), and sirtuin histone deacetylases (111). This is medical-speak for inhibiting the inappropriate replication and modification of RNA and DNA … Suramin also showed inhibitory effects against components of the coagulation cascade (71, 130) … Excessive coagulation causes blood clots, mini-clots, strokes, and unusually heavy menstrual cycles.”
An interesting idea from President Trump:
China owes us and the world for what they did. Cancel the debt the US owes to China.
Dr. Wolf posted this and then was immediately banned from Twitter:
There was a real conspiracy to push the vaccine and eliminate valid alternatives -causing vast numbers of deaths unnecessarily, as well as cause the damage to people's lives and the economy.
The same people responsible for the virus were responsible for eliminating valid treatment alternatives for the same virus.
The c19hcq.com website tracks all of the international studies on hydroxychloroquine and its effects on the coronavirus. There is now a new study and the results are in for HCQ for COVID-19: Real-time meta analysis of 245 studies.
HCQ is not effective when used very late with high dosages over a long period but effectiveness improves with earlier usage and improved dosing. Early treatment consistently shows positive effects. That’s the science.
Summary: Fauci's emails reveal key government medical officials knew about the viable alternatives to vaccination (HCQ, Ivermectin etc.), but colluded to trash them in public, sponsor studies designed to fail, defund legitimate studies, and persecute experts who supported the alternatives.
About that Shedding from Vaccinated People:
SHEILA HEMPHILL: I’m Sheila Hemphill with Texas Right to Know and I have the privilege to be with Dr. Sherri Tenpenny who has decades of research on what exactly is happening in regards to vaccines and what is, particularly, happening with this COVID Vaccine, so Dr. Tenpenny, thank you for your years of work.
DR. SHERRI TENPENNY: Thank you
SHEILA HEMPHILL: We’ve had an opportunity to listen to her presentation and there are a couple of things I would like for her to highlight to you. Please explain the report of the two-year-old little boy that had been babysat by his [grandparents].
DR. SHERRI TENPENNY: So here’s the thing, is that a lot of people are talking about “When I am around someone who is vaccinated, can I contract anything from them?” They’ve called this “shedding” which is an inaccurate term, because “shedding” means that if I got, say, a chickenpox vaccine, and I shed a chickenpox virus to someone else, they would contract chickenpox. What’s happening here is we’re getting a transmission that we believe is the spike protein that has been created by these injections into people. It’s been transmitted to other people without close personal contact.
We had over (1:00) 11000 reports of women who had abnormal bleeding; post-menopausal women who started to bleed, women in their 20s, 30s, and 40s who have periods that were like clockwork—they started to bleed. Young people are starting to bleed, and we’ve had reports of people who have lost two-thirds of their blood volume. Their hemoglobin has gone down to 4. We have a case report of a 22-month-old little girl who spent the weekend with her vaccinated grandparents and came home and was passing vaginal blood clots the size of small eggs. We have the reports of 3 and 4-year-old girls that are in daycare. They come home bleeding and they have had no sexual abuse. This is just bleeding and their panties were full of blood. This is actually happening. We have reports of cerebral vascular thrombosis. There have been over 117 reports to VAERS. We rarely see one of those a year, and we know that VAERS only tracks somewhere between one and ten percent of what’s actually happening. We now have (2:00) over 4,000 people that have been killed by these shots, and we have more than 193,000 adverse events reported by this shot alone. VAERS usually gets thirty reports per year on a sum total of 20 shots. This shot has been around since December, so in five months it has killed more than 4,000 people that we know of and has had more than 193,000 adverse events. That’s an FDA database number—monitored by the FDA, collected by the CDC. Those are government numbers. We can not—we can not—mandate an experimental product that can kill people and harm people, has no long-term studies whatsoever.
We are now mandating this [sic]—we are now advising that children ages 12 to 15 get this shot. Does anybody have any data on what girls who have started their periods, did they stop? Girls going into puberty at age 12, are they ever going to go into puberty? I talked to a physician last night who works an Urgent Care and she said she’s getting (3:00) 30 to 35 men per week, coming into her Urgent Care, talking about testicular swelling and lack of being able to maintain an erection after getting their shot.
I get reports, 10-20 per day, from all over the country, of people telling me horrendous stories of people who get one of these injections, so they can be any of the three, not just one of them, who have got their second shot and eight days later, fifteen days later they’re dead. These are deadly weapons. To mandate this for anyone, whether it’s a child, whether it’s a teacher, whether it’s anything to do with anybody in the government--you people who are mandating these things will have blood on your hands, and please don’t roll your eyes at me, because that’s exactly what’s going to happen.
India Bar Association serves legal notice on WHO Chief Scientist Soumya Swaminathan for lying about Ivermectin effectiveness against COVID-19
India added Ivermectin to its COVID-19 mitigation protocols. It resulted in dramatic drops in cases and deaths. All the while, World Health Organization (WHO) Chief Scientist and India native Dr. Soumya Swaminathan used her platform to spread disinformation about Ivermectin. Her May 10 tweet implied that Ivermectin was neither safe nor effective as a COVID-19 treatment.
Now the India Bar Association (IBA) is taking action.
The organization commenced legal action against Dr. Swaminathan by serving her a scathing 51-page notice on May 25. The notice accuses Dr. Swaminathan of “spreading disinformation and misguiding the people of India, in order to fulfill her agenda.” A press release from the India Bar Association says Dr. Swaminathan “ignored studies/reports and has deliberately suppressed the data regarding effectiveness of the drug Ivermectin, with an intent to dissuade the people of India from using Ivermectin.”
The India Bar Association did not pull any punches in their legal arguments. They compiled mountains of evidence not only reinforcing the effectiveness of Ivermectin as a COVID-19 treatment, but also of Dr. Swaminathan persistent disinformation campaigns.